The Catholic Thing
A Last-Minute Assessment Print E-mail
By Michael Uhlmann   
Thursday, 30 October 2008

Barring a last-minute surge for John McCain of the sort that carried Harry Truman to victory in 1948, Barack Obama will be elected next week as the 44th president of the United States. A year ago, no one (perhaps even including Obama) saw this coming. Back then – an eternity ago – Iraq was the dominant issue, Hillary Clinton was the favorite to win the Democratic nomination, and John McCain was the least likely Republican candidate. The collapse of international financial markets and the prospect of recession eclipsed Iraq; the gears on the well-oiled Clinton machine suddenly seized up; and the failure of (theoretically) more plausible candidacies made McCain the GOP nominee.

These are only three oddities that have made for a very strange political year. There are any number of others. Who would have predicted that an unknown female governor of Alaska would become so prominent on the national stage? And despite the well-documented liberal proclivities of the mainstream media, did anyone foresee that they would become unabashed cheerleaders for the Democratic ticket?

Then there is the extreme volatility of this year’s polling data, quite unlike anything seen in recent decades. During the past three weeks in particular, prominent polls have shown double-digit margins in favor of Obama, or a race within the margin of error. Once the actual votes are counted, the poll-meisters will figure out why and how so many of them ended up looking like amateur Ouija board players.

In the meantime, here’s my guess. Pollsters adjust their raw data in accordance with what they believe to be historical patterns and, comparing those patterns with current data, make certain assumptions about the likely turnout by various demographic sub-groups – e.g., men and women; Republicans, Democrats, and Independents; by race, religion, and socio-economic status, etc. The process necessarily entails more art than science, so equally competent and neutral statisticians can vary in predictions.

The adjusted figures in all cases rest on what happened in the past. But what if the past is not prologue? What if the electorate, for reasons that aren’t immediately discernible, decides to break with historical patterns? Something like that may be in play now, which is the first election since 1952 in which an incumbent president or vice-president is not running for the top job. Add to that another precedent-breaker: the first African-American presidential nominee in American history, who may draw blacks to the polls in unprecedented numbers. Yet again, given the apparent enthusiasms engendered by Obama’s candidacy among the young, will there be a large youth turnout, or (as has traditionally been the case) will many of them be busy on election day? Perhaps even more important are the psychological and economic consequences of the financial meltdown occasioned by the bursting of the housing bubble.

Assessing the impact of these phenomena on voter behavior is a judgment call. Competent experts can and will disagree. Perhaps the electorate will revert to recent patterns – in which case, each party will succeed in turning out its base to the maximum feasible extent, and we’ll be up all night next Tuesday (and perhaps for some days thereafter) waiting for the winner.

Alternatively, one may argue that “change” is in the air and that, whatever the pattern of the past twenty years or so, the voters may be of a mind to take the nation in an entirely different direction.

Which brings us to Senator Obama, the least experienced major-party candidate for the presidency in recent memory, if not in all of American history. Despite his ideological proclivities, which are decidedly left-of-center, he has run a brilliant campaign, especially compared to the Republicans, who have yet to come up with an overarching, coherent argument for electing John McCain – except, perhaps, for fact that he’s not Barack Obama or George W. Bush.

Other than Democrat enthusiasts, a large segment of the public are clearly nervous about Obama, as well they should be. Four years ago, he was an obscure Illinois state legislator of undistinguished achievement. Before that, he was a community organizer in South Chicago, which is not exactly a familiar job description or one that (pace MSNBC’s Chris Matthews) sends a tingle up the leg of most voters. His three-year record in the Senate is likewise devoid of accomplishment, which is perhaps understandable inasmuch as he spent most of that time running for president. So what, precisely, are his qualifications?

Beyond his remarkably thin professional experience, his penchant for far left-wing nostrums is his defining characteristic. His campaign, with the cooperation of the mainstream media, has done a masterful job in hiding that from the public. But it doesn’t require an ideological brain surgeon to figure out where his head and heart will take him. His economic and social policies are radically redistributionist. (Why the Republicans failed to spell this out until a few weeks ago is beyond me). His foreign policy, at best, is incoherent and, at worst, dangerously naive. (Joe Biden wasn’t kidding when he prophesied that as president, Obama would be severely tested by America’s enemies.) On abortion, his views are brutally hostile to the most vulnerable members of the human species and, if he carries through on his promises, he will eliminate every last vestige of legal protection, not only for the unborn but for babies who survive abortion. (That McCain was incapable of pointing this out is perhaps the most appalling feature of a generally artless campaign.)

Notwithstanding all this, there is a better-than-even chance that the American people will elect this man to the highest office in the land. If so, we will not be able to say we didn’t know what was coming.

Michael Uhlmann writes frequently in matters of law, culture, and politics.

(c) 2008 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights write to: info at thecatholicthing dot org

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (5)Add Comment
The Catholic Bishops
written by Gary, October 31, 2008
If a President Obama signs the dreaded Freedom of Choice Act, how culpable will the Catholic bishops be? Most of them have spent the last 35 years ignoring abortion and paying lip-service to pro-life issues. Fortunately, a good number of brave shepherds are finally speaking out, but it may be a case of too little, too late. And the USCCB's voter guide could easily be construed into support for Obama. Michael, if Obama wins, I look forward to a future column on this issue.
written by Joe, October 31, 2008
A horror story befit for Halloween.
Just punishment?
written by Barb, October 31, 2008
God gives us what we deserve sometimes. Such chastening is meant to bring us back to Him. If we get obama, we shall truly be suffering in so many ways we will be finding ourselves pleading for God's mercy or cursing Him. The division must happen before the Church is healed, let alone america. The split is easily seen these days, but there are still some "muddy" areas that need to be swept away.
written by Robert, October 31, 2008
I was able to vote early in the state where I live and voted against Obama. I've prayed a novena. What else could I have done to keep Obama out of office?
written by Beverly O\\\'Neill, October 31, 2008
That's just it, the American people DON'T know it's coming! I would venture to say that the average American is getting all of their info from CNN and or FOX.
Even Catholics. Let's face it, mainstream media is pro Obama, and the majority of Americans are sheep. So who will they follow? The media is the most power filled persuader in the world today. And yes, Obama has run a brilliant campaign, what happened to the Republicans, the convention drab.
We need nothing short of Divine intervention.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


Other Articles By This Author