The Catholic Thing
Accommodation Print E-mail
By James Schall   
Thursday, 20 November 2008

The Canadian Parliamentary Election was held on October 14. David Warren writes from Ottawa: “By common consent of the five major parties, there was no discussion whatever of abortion, gay marriage, ‘human rights’ tribunals, or any other of the civilizational issues that are, in Canada, decided exclusively by liberal judges” (10/21/08). What did the “Bishops, North of the Border,” as Warren calls them, have to say about this? The answer is stark: “Our bishops had nothing to say about this — or, at least, nothing audible. As American may soon learn, Catholics of any elevation are left with little to say, once the triumph of postmodern liberalism becomes so complete that a dissonant voice may be stifled in the cause of ‘national unity.’”

In the immediate post-election era, we see a desperate effort to “accommodate” the Church to the new political “facts.” What facts? 1) A majority of Catholics voted for a candidate, however charismatic, whose anti-life record is the worst among contemporary public officials. 2) The country is out of line with other “modern” countries who have long ago decided, with the Canadians, namely, that these life issues are no longer open to discussion by “reasonable” men. A religion that upholds them is, in fact, bordering on the fanatical. So, it is time to cool it.

Some eighty bishops, including Cardinal Rigali in the name of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), did make strong pro-life statements about the centrality of this issue, which are worth looking at on the Conference’s website. Still, Catholic politicians like Nancy Pelosi and the new Vice President, have no doubt noticed that many bishops, seemingly the majority, did not speak. Since they have not been personally excommunicated or denied Communion, some quiet rationale must exist whereby their pragmatic political necessities of approving pro-abortion positions, while remaining good Catholics, can be reconciled. A number of writers on the Catholic “left” have referred to the bishops who did issue statements as mavericks or a small minority. This too implies that there is deep disagreement within the ranks.

The Holy Father and the bishops’ conference have, in the meantime, sent gracious letters to the president-elect congratulating him and hoping for cooperation. These acts are subject to much speculation. The fact of election does mean that the new president has to be dealt with, even if he turns out in practice to be worse or better than expected. Whether Mr. Obama will imitate President Clinton and sign all the pro-abortion decrees he can immediately after the inauguration remains to be seen. Most pro-abortion and pro-gay groups expect that he will; others think he may be prudent.

But what grounds are there for this “accommodation?” The obvious one is simply to imitate the Canadians and Europeans where these issues are no longer “on the table.” No sense in wasting time worrying about them. They cannot in any realistic sense “change,” to cite a famous campaign slogan. Here we have the same “realism” with which some tried to convince Ronald Reagan and John Paul II that communism could not change, so we should accept it and be like the rest of men.

Another approach is the “seamless garment” argument. In practice, this view seems to be a proportionalist position; that is, a country and the world have many, many problems that have to be related to each other. The life issue in all its phases is but one of these. If we worry about that issue alone, we will neglect other equally or more important things, like poverty, environment, war, economy, heaven knows what. In this list, life issues may be significant but they must be “balanced” with other things. This is what Catholic politicians do. They are “protecting” the Church by showing that it is not a one-idea lobby.

Next, the lesser evil argument seems fruitful. In political things, the choices are not always, or even usually, between good and good, but, as here, between greater and lesser evils. So a politician or judge is confronted with two evils. In practice, the only alternatives presented are awful. He knows that. Thus, he works to effect the “lesser” one, even if that lesser one is still an evil. His only other alternative is to get out of politics, another evil.

When we spread out the list of possible evils that are connected with life issues, it is said, little things like abortion, which after all is a “right,” can be “tolerated.” The politician has a clear conscience. He is working for the greater good; that is, he is representing the Christian view by preventing something more heinous. He could not do this if he could not get elected to office. To achieve the latter goal, he must not appear anti-abortion.

Confused cries of “national unity” and “accommodation” are already being heard South of the (Canadian) Border.

James Schall, S.J., is a professor at Georgetown University, and one of the most prolific Catholic writers in America.

(c) 2008 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights write to: info at thecatholicthing dot org

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (8)Add Comment
written by LWS, November 20, 2008
Prayers for an end to abortion offered after every Mass (as they were offered for an end to communism) will place this issue where it belongs - in God's hands. If the bishops of the Catholic Church cannot agree, to whom shall we turn? To Him who has the words of everylasting life.
written by John Thompson, November 20, 2008
I, for one, believe the Church's teaching that life issues must come first. What good is it to gain a world filled with "social justice," but lose our soul? I am through with accommodationist and pragmatists, and propose that "orthodox" Catholics join forces with Evangelicals to form a Social Conservative" party. We may not win, but at least we will bear honest witness.
written by James the Least, November 20, 2008
Fr. Schall, it's not clear to me what you're saying here. In any case, I think people need to be woken up to the fact that it's not just "life issues" that are at stake today. It's not like the modernist left both in and outside the Church are only mistaken about "life issues" The life issues simply show up the degeneracy and evil of their thought in a particularly stark way. But they are literally wrong about everything--and the man who can't defend his positions by reason will do so by force.
written by William H. Phelan, November 20, 2008
Isn't it fascinating how the Jews lament that Pius XII did too little too late? When the Pope and bishops do too little too late on abortion, no one raises an eyebrow. Great article Fr. Schall. Bishops: Who appointed them? Why haven't the weak sisters been removed?
written by Acroamatic, November 21, 2008
I agree with LWS. Prayer would be the most powerful witness in this social context. Pray for the lives of the unborn day in and day out, publicly and privately. We'll probably be surprised what turns up.
written by Chris, November 27, 2008
>>So a politician or judge is confronted with two evils.Unless he's Earl Warren or Anthony Kennedy, who are not Father Schall's favorites (or mine). Jurisprudence, to be sure, but it was Warren who said his rulings were based on "is it fair" -- and that is the legislature's task, not the judge's.

And, although pols would tell us otherwise, there are always more choices than one of two evils (or quitting). Jesse Helms just did the right thing.
written by Martin, November 27, 2008
Fr Schall thank you for your tireless witness.

You're beacon whose light reaches over here to Australia.

Thank you
townsville accommodation
written by Rajeev, October 06, 2009
Thanks for providing such a useful Information. It is really helpful for me keep it up.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


Other Articles By This Author