The Catholic Thing
Harm Reduction, Not Enough Print E-mail
By Matthew Hanley   
Wednesday, 29 July 2009

Tolstoy’s Kreutzer Sonata begins with a conversation among passengers on a train about the growing permissiveness on divorce in Russian society. But it quickly turns into an extended philosophical monologue about sex and marriage. Pozdnyshev, the protagonist, anxiously reflects back upon his relationships with women – including his wife whom he eventually kills. Pozdnyshev initiated his liaisons not out of an overpowering love for a single woman, but in compliance with convention. It all begins as half-hearted indulgence. No one discourages him from this course of action; on the contrary, respectable members of society encourage him to do so. What about disease? Not to worry – the doctors are taking care of that. Passion soon rules him.

He becomes utterly tormented by the “abyss of error in which we live regarding women and our relations with them.” His anguish far exceeds the mysterious phenomenon Aristotle observed long ago: post coitum omne animale triste (after intercourse, every man is sad). One of the most memorable characters of Larry McMurtry’s novels about the American West, Texas Ranger Augustus McCrae, recognizes a truth in that adage, and wishes that Aristotle – “that old man who talked about it to begin with” – had explained why this was so. But this is mere passing sadness.

Pozdnyshev, on the other hand, needs to assuage deep internal suffering brought about by an acute awareness of his dissolute life. The answer to this problem, for Tolstoy, is to be found not in the Redeemer and reconciliation, but in the renunciation of what he views as the source of the problem: the sexual act itself. Pozdnyshev can only now feel outright disdain for it, even going so far as to call it “unnatural.” Here Tolstoy goes off the rails, and with misguided zeal proselytizes for the Manicheanism that St. Augustine himself held prior to his conversion to Catholicism.

But interspersed throughout the short story, published in 1889, Tolstoy does make some arresting observations about the efforts of authorities to contain lifestyle-related diseases. These are of great contemporary relevance, and cannot be so easily dismissed.

He is critical of what today would be called “Harm Reduction” measures – the default approach of the public health establishment – which studiously avoid the moral and spiritual implications of behavior, and generally refuse to encourage risk-free behavior.

“You are not living rightly, live better,” Tolstoy observes, is something you cannot say to others, or even admit to yourself.

Our own non-judgmentalism – inescapably a judgment itself – is not so new after all.

Harm Reduction measures do not necessarily convey neutral messages. Tolstoy implicates “paternal government” that seeks to make profligacy safe, as well as doctors, the “priests of science” who benefit financially from offering pills or devices that “safeguard vice.” The net effect: “they organize proper, well-regulated debauchery.”

He could easily be describing the World Health Organization (WHO). Or George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI).

They would be more accurately described as cultural institutions rather than medical or health institutions when it comes to dealing with lifestyle diseases. Like most other national and local bodies or NGOs, they have essentially become vehicles through which the creeds of scientific materialism, radical individualism, and non-judgementalism are promulgated. That is why Tolstoy’s word “debauchery” startles us today – its use is more unacceptable than the acts it describes.

Technological fixes are manifestly not the solution to Russia’s staggering population implosion and multiple health crises. Demographer Nicholas Eberstadt points out that Russia’s astonishingly high rates of cardiovascular disease, accidents, and poisonings are each deeply influenced by massive alcohol consumption. Russia’s HIV epidemic, one of the fastest growing in the world, is fueled in large part by injecting drugs, such as heroin.

Soros’ OSI, and many others, agitate for Russia to reverse its ban on methadone – classified as an “essential” drug by the WHO – and other opiate based “replacement” drugs such as Buprenorphine, as a means of minimizing exposure to contaminated needles. But that is the last thing Russia needs. Recent experience from the former Soviet republic of Georgia explains why.

The Buprenorphine that was prescribed to heroin addicts in Europe wound up on the black market and was smuggled into Georgia, where it quickly became the drug of choice – 39 percent of clients at drug clinics became addicted to it. A 2006 Lancet article reported that its arrival has led to an 80 percent increase in the number of drug addicts nationwide. Local authorities complain they are fighting a “big-business” juggernaut: each tablet of Buprenorphine is sold on the streets in Georgia at a rate forty-two times higher than it goes for in France. The experienced British physician and prolific author Theodore Dalrymple also argues that it is hardly “essential” treatment – given that it has been readily relinquished and resold for cash by those who allegedly need it – even if most choose to overlook this point of logic.

Russia’s crises point to a deeper malaise which can not merely be “treated” superficially. Tolstoy recognized that, and wrestled with it. He wound up in profound error by denying the goodness of the body, but he was onto something with respect to the cultural and philosophical lethargy that exalts the Harm Reduction approach to lifestyle disease control.

Happily, we need not go to Tolstoy’s extremes to conclude that culture and spirituality need to be taken seriously. Much contemporary scientific evidence also indicates that, for human beings, Harm Reduction is just not good enough.

The National Catholic Bioethics Center will publish Matthew Hanley's book, with Jokin D. Irala, M.D., Affirming Love, Avoiding AIDS: What Africa Can Teach the West in the Summer of 2009.

© 2009 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info at thecatholicthing dot org

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.




Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (5)Add Comment
A great silence
written by linda smith, July 30, 2009
I have been astonished at the silence of the medical profession in the face of an epidemic of sexually transmitted disease. I know of only two physicians who have dared to broach the subject. Promiscuity has resulted in some cases in incurable conditions, robbing young people of health at the very beginning of adult life. Homosexual activity is associated with serious harm to the human body. And yet most doctors are silent.
breaking the silence
written by Beverly Moore, July 30, 2009
UCLA psychiatrist Dr. Miriam Grossman is one of the few who has broken this silence. She wrote a great book called “Unprotected”about the effects of the PC harm reduction mentality on young people at our college campuses. (it was first published anonymously - which tells you a lot)
Meth kills
written by Bob Nelson, July 31, 2009
Yes, and methadone kills! Sometimes the death rate from methodone can be higher than from heroin itself. Some cure, huh.
written by Dan, July 31, 2009
Promiscuity closely correlates with depression and suicide rates. The greater the number of sexual partners, the greater the risk for depression and suicide. It is widely assumed that monogomous marriage is the gold standard for pyschological health. Interestingly however, although the data is sparse, there is some evidence that the depression and suicide rates of adult virgins are even lower than those of monogamous married people.
written by Jeffrey Andreoni, February 03, 2010
Perhaps the reason "promiscuity" leads to depression is because of (an unduly influenced) society that demonises acts of love and passion while simultaneously lauding acts of violence and self-interest. Also, "Post coitum omne animal triste est" is most often attributed to Saint Augustine.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


Other Articles By This Author