The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
Italian Crucifixes and Swiss Minarets Print E-mail
By Joseph Wood   
Thursday, 17 December 2009
 
Ed's Note: Thanks again to all who have responded to our end-of-year appeal for The Catholic Thing. We're very near our goal, but this is the last day before Christmas week - and all of us need to turn our minds and hearts to other matters as we celebrate the birth of the Savior. TCT depends on the support of readers. So, please, make your contribution to our efforts today and help us to continue to bring you the wisdom and inspiration of the writers you read here each morning. - Robert Royal

It has been a hard month for Europe in its handling of public religious symbols. In early November, the European Court of Human Rights decreed from on high in Strasbourg that Crucifixes could not be displayed in Italian schools, in deference to non-Christians who might be oppressed by going to the chalkboard (happily, chalkboards still exist in Italy) under a Crucifix. This decision united Italians across the political spectrum, as possibly no other decision could have, in favor of protecting an Italian national identity that is historically tied to Christianity. Mariastella Gelmini, the current Italian Minister for Education, said that the ruling was "an offence against our traditions. The presence of a Crucifix in the classroom does not signify adherence to Roman Catholicism, rather it is a symbol of our tradition." She pointed out, "The history of Italy is marked by symbols and if we erase symbols we erase part of ourselves. No one, and certainly not an ideological European court, will succeed in erasing our identity. It is not by eliminating the traditions of individual countries that a united Europe is built.”

Well, let’s leave aside the question of what a Crucifix, with the image of our Lord suffering on the cross, might mean to those for whom Christianity has no immediate relevance. Let’s be glad that the Crucifix still means anything at all in the public discourse in Europe, if not on the bench in Strasbourg. It’s Advent, after all, and we can wait for something better.

Ho hum. Another moment in post-historical, post-Enlightenment, post-Christian Europe. But then, on November 29, in a country that seemed to have forgotten long ago what the cross on its flag meant, Swiss voters jolted their political elites by approving a referendum banning the construction of minarets, the towering (and often beautiful) spires that adorn many mosques. Now, this little display of direct democracy caused real alarm across the bien-pensant salons of Europe. Some in Switzerland’s political class rushed to condemn the primitive instincts of the electorate to whom they are, in theory, accountable. The French Foreign Minister, Bernard Kouchner, founder of Doctors without Borders and a solid supporter of secular human rights, pronounced himself “a bit scandalized” by the vote (one wonders whether he thought about the original meaning of “scandal,” or what else in contemporary European society might be scandalous). Advocates of religious liberty joined the chorus, and with good reason, given that the suppression of religious symbols is a shame, even where those symbols also carry political connotations.

But Kouchner’s boss, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, took a different tack and wrote about the Swiss decision in the U.K.’s Guardian:

The Swiss vote has nothing to do with religious freedom or freedom of conscience. No one, in Switzerland or anywhere else, questions these fundamental freedoms. Europeans are welcoming and tolerant: it is in their nature and culture. But they do not want their way of life to be undermined, and the feeling that one's identity is being lost can cause deep unhappiness. The more open the world – the greater the traffic of ideas, people, capital and goods – the more we need anchors and benchmarks, and the more we need to feel that we are not alone. National identity is the antidote to tribalism and sectarianism.

Sarkozy hit on the central question in this era for Europe: identity. For Americans, minarets (of reasonable proportion) at a newly constructed mosque might raise eyebrows and provoke questions. But they do not immediately strike at the sense of American identity. American identity is not yet as fragile as that of post-Christian Europe, which looks back at its earlier self through the blinders of post-Enlightenment relativism, empiricism, and materialism. Puzzled and aware of something crucial that has been lost, Europeans perceive dimly a past when the Crucifix might have been generally understood not just as a secular cultural symbol but as having transcendent sacramental meaning. Sarkozy knows there is something wrong. The 57 percent of the Swiss voters who favored the minaret ban know there is something wrong. The Muslims of Europe know there is much wrong. But for now, only the latter group is offering a solution that suggests strength and endurance in what was once known as Christendom.

The Vatican condemned the ban on school Crucifixes in Italy and supported the Swiss bishops’ reprimand of the referendum on minarets. The Holy See is right to support religious liberty in a consistent way, and we should hope for the day when European identity is strong enough to welcome, without fear, symbols of other faiths and cultures. But for now, Europe is muddling through a sea of secularist disbelief, disoriented by the assertions of those with a different faith and, even more, by its own loss of faith and of confidence in reason. The past month brought the confusion to the fore but offered no way forward.

So, for now, we wait.

 


Joseph Wood is a former White House official who worked on foreign policy, including Vatican affairs.


(c) 2009 The Catholic Thing. All right reserved. For reprint rights write to: info at thecatholicthing dot org

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (4)Add Comment
0
Hope for Christendom
written by Willie, December 18, 2009
Excellent. piece as it dovetails well with the piece on Ireland As Europe wallows in the quagmire of secular humanism and relativism is grows weaker and confused. Its identity is frustrated by the atheism as well as the mindset of the Saracen immigrant..For sure European identity will get no better under the leadership of the present leaders of the EU. I think there are some hopeful signs as frustrated countries speak out. The influence of Benedict XVI may be more powerful than some think.
0
To Efface a Culture
written by Ars Artium, December 18, 2009
The European Union lawmakers have a precedent to which they can refer. In North Korea all historic symbols of Korean culture have been destroyed. This was done to destroy the cultural soul of the Korean people, to break their spirit, and remake them in the image of the new ideology. Very interesting.
0
The Symbols
written by Joseph, December 18, 2009
If it weren't for all these wonderful symbols, why, Dan Brown would be writing ad copy instead of enjoying his millions from The DaVinci Code and other books that exploit religious iconography. Less facetiously, one might add that the Cross has always been the great Stumbling Block to both Jew and Gentle who finding the image a disturbing representation of God's suffering and Man's. "The Cross is evil at its worst and Goodness at its best," Bishop Sheen said. A reminder of an unpaid bill.
0
old memories
written by Maggie, December 19, 2009
Maybe the Swiss remembered a time in history that they didn't even know that they knew: the Battle of Vienna, the Battle of Lepanto, the 700 years of Muslim oppression of Spain. Maybe the sight of the minaret awakened something deep in their memories, and, without knowing exactly why, they reacted to defend against something that they didn't know they knew.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner