The Catholic Thing
Simply Complex Print E-mail
By Robert Royal   
Sunday, 18 October 2009

I stumbled on a discussion of religion in a major secular magazine the other day in which Catholicism came up. One of the participants in the conversation scoffed at the Church for thinking that you can answer the huge questions of human existence in one or two brief sentences. Presumably, he had a brush with the Baltimore Catechism as a child and wasn’t moved to look further. Few do. But the very fact that he remembered the existence of those brief catechism formulas, probably after years of never thinking about them, shows just how effective they are at a certain age. Using them is just one of the many ways in which the Church has been wise, while the wise are sometimes foolish. It takes a certain spiritual tact to know when to be simple and when complex, and how to hold both forms of truth together.

Of course, there’s a lot more to Church teaching than basic catechetics, and anyone (including the scoffer mentioned above) who reflects for a second knows it. In fact, you wouldn’t have to try very hard to find someone else objecting that Church teaching must clearly be wrong because it has built up a complex theology out of the “simple” message of Jesus. It’s an old story: any stick will do to beat up the Church. But if you look at the reason why many prominent coverts came into the Church prior to Vatican II – one of the great periods of conversion – it’s because she provided answers, simpler ones for the young and straightforward, complex ones for the complex. But in any event, answers that matter because they fit each case. As the novelist Muriel Spark said, “The reason I became a Roman Catholic was because it explained me.” How could you have a universal Church without truths that speak to every kind of person?

It’s a curious thing that our culture has changed so deeply that claiming to have answers looks suspect to lots of people – sadly, some who regard themselves as Catholic. We have taken one half of the pursuit of truth – the necessary first phase, in which we raise questions about what is really the case – as if it’s the whole story. Truth itself, though, is the point of the exercise, otherwise why bother if all we can achieve is more informed or sophisticated doubt? Since man cannot live by doubt alone, usually those who recommend doubt mean doubt about your beliefs. They’re quite comfortable with their own.

All truths are ultimately complex for human minds because all truths participate in the mysteries of God, which are not open to us. But that does not mean that short, simple answers are always inadequate. The judgment that they are is not so much wrong as unwise. We don’t use a Q & A catechism when we want to reflect deeply on the nature of things. That’s not its purpose. We do use it when we want to teach our kids and remind ourselves not simply of basic truths, but of essentials of everyday life. The simple questions and answers are like the times table. You will use the times tables and much more complex math if your job is to design a bridge or put a man on the moon. But the higher math is, in a way, a narrow specialty. It’s the simple math that has a stronger grip on human life because we use it every day – to figure out how to make up the baby formula, to budget money to pay for school, to work out a fair arrangement with a neighbor. Some simple calculations are so interwoven with daily life that life would be almost impossible without them.

It’s the same with basic religious truths. When you’re facing surgery, or are tempted to cheat or steal, simple formulas learned early about God’s love or clear rules like the Ten Commandments are what you most need. They’re what all of us need most of the time, the learned probably more than anyone because they can be tempted to think that the really important things are the ones that very intelligent people, far removed from the mere concerns of everyday life, work out on their own. It takes wisdom – not merely brains and advanced degrees – to know how such complexity has little worth if it loses touch with a certain kind of simplicity.

The Church has done a remarkable job over millennia in holding the two kinds of truth together in ways that encourage the most daring speculation without losing a grip on real human life. It’s a strange thing this simple complexity or complex simplicity. But nothing else seems quite to fit the human need. Edith Sitwell, another great convert of the century just passed, hit upon exactly the right formula. After her conversion, she took to studying Aquinas and other great thinkers, but not like you would tackle a physics textbook for abstract knowledge. She studied them because they responded to a great and simple necessity:

“To read them is like being put in an oxygen tent when one is dying.”

Robert Royal is editor-in-chief of The Catholic Thing, and president of the Faith & Reason Institute in Washington, D.C. His most recent book is The God That Did Not Fail: How Religion Built and Sustains the West.

© 2009 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info at thecatholicthing dot org

The Catholic Thing
is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (8)Add Comment
First, the BC
written by Lee Gilbert, October 19, 2009
Yet we are not catechizing our children. The catechetical establishment is still foundering about, united only in their animus against the Baltimore Catechism. Nevertheless I wish pastors would hand it out at baptisms, mail it to their parishioners, urging them to start with their 4y yr olds (sic!)- when memory is voracious. Dorothy Sayers calls this the poll parrot stage. At that rate the child will be thoroughly catechized by age 8. This works!- esp w/ lives of the saints added.
Amor Dei, contemptum sui?
written by Willie, October 19, 2009
Ah! To return to those days when the question. "Why did God make me,' was so simple and satisfying. But we have especially in the last several decades become more knowledgeable and can even make humans in a lab. We have become like little gods. Some of us meander our weary ways through life full of doubt, bordering on nihilism. The greatest minds know that to find happiness again we must pursue truth in an age where truth is denied. We must again find our souls in that simple catechism
Relativity vs. Simplicity
written by Joseph, October 19, 2009
Bishop Sheen pointed out the inconsistency of the human mind, on the one hand, being able to accept the mysteries of Einstein/Science, and on the other hand unable to accept the Mysteries of Christ. Thus the modern world accepts scientific dogmas without reason or proof and declares that religion must be free from dogmas and mysteries.

Which are simpler to understand or embrace as truth? The Beatitudes or E=MC2?
Thoroughly Catechized?
written by Deacon Sean Smith, October 19, 2009
I very much like the Baltimore Catechism, and think we would do well to have more "learning by rote". However, I do not think that using it, or any tool, can ever result in one being "thoroughly catechized". After years of diaconate formation and nearly having completed my Masters in Theology, I feel I'm just finally equipped to ask better questions, not that I have all the answers. Ultimately, the answer is found the the triune God, which is not someone we are ever done learning more about.
Yes, thoroughly
written by Lee Gilbert, October 19, 2009
Not ready for ordination, no, but yes, thoroughly catechized. Given the BC formation from 4yrs, a child going into first grade will know more, far more of the faith than present graduates of Catholic high schools. In all seriousness. Of course, it doesnt have to be either or. Let the diocese round out his faith with other texts, e.g the Didache series. But yes, In comparison with his entire generation he is indeed already thoroughly catechized going into first grade. He is equipped for life
BC or AD
written by Manduca, October 19, 2009
I sprouted on the Baltimore Catechism and 3 Harvard degrees later I'm still a devoted Catholic. I agree that it's like the multiplication tables or phonics. Even now when beginning a more "advanced" discussion, I find it convenient to ground myself in the BC. It is a remarkable distillation of Roman Catholicism, a library in a brief space. We are sprouting 5 Catholics of our own on the BC and find the review and memorization useful both for ourselves and the kids. Highly recommended!
C.S. Lewis
written by Michal, October 19, 2009
Your essay reminds me of a character in C.S. Lewis's "Great Divorce," a man who refused to leave hell and go to heaven because he thought the purpose of life was to struggle with questions and not to find answers. Bright minds have been poisoned by Albert Camus, who argued that the struggle is the point of existence, rather than arriving at answers.

Sadly, such people are doomed to suffering. Sometimes, there is an answer to a hard question. Why can't the answer sometimes be a simple one?
Aiming Too Low
written by Deacon Sean Smith, October 19, 2009
Lee, I have spent far too much time with adults, young and old, that have a depth of faith that is that of a first grader! It may be possible to learn a given set of answers to specific questions by rote, and I encourage that as an age appropriate method of catechesis. But there is no way that a person is "thoroughly catechized" that way. Ultimately, the truth is a person, not just a set of propositions. The propositions give shape to the journey, but are not in themselves the destination.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


Other Articles By This Author