The Catholic Thing
Teachers as Witnesses Print E-mail
By Aaron Urbanczyk   
Wednesday, 02 December 2009

"Contemporary man listens more willingly to witnesses than to teachers, or if he listens to teachers, he does so because they are witnesses.” John Paul II and Benedict XVI have quoted these remarkable words of Paul VI. As Paul’s successors, they know wisdom when they see it. The Church is, of course, no stranger to education. The Catholic intellectual tradition is rich with insights into the nature of learning, but we should expect no less of the very institution that gave us the university.

I am a college professor and I would like to reflect upon the powerful words of Paul VI from that perspective. It is hard to think of contemporary college professors as “witnesses,” especially when so many of them are reticent to “profess” anything (so why do they merit the term “professor?). One plague of the modern university is the bizarre notion that the teacher ought not to impose his beliefs upon his students. No, indeed! The professor ought rather to be a sophisticated master chef preparing the sumptuous banquet of neutral information.

With prejudice towards no idea, a kind disposition towards all, and grave objectivity, the professor merely comments upon the relative strengths and weaknesses of each factual morsel comprising the feast of knowledge. Under this model, the uninitiated student, whose tastes are unformed, is left to his appetites – he gravitates towards what he personally finds interesting and meaningful. College thus becomes a type of four-year buffet where the student, safeguarded by the scrupulous “objectivity” of his instructors, makes knowledge and meaning for himself, without fear of interference from those serving him the banquet.

Such an educational model rejects outright the notion of teacher as witness. Yet in an odd way Paul VI does have advocates in university circles. The intellectually honest among the professoriate know that the notion of the “purely objective” teacher is nonsense. Those who probe into the nature of education quickly conclude that it is simply impossible to “teach from nowhere,” as if the positions and perspectives of the teacher could simply be suspended in a weightless vacuum of objectivity. Further, this notion of pure objectivity in pedagogy treats neither the teacher nor the student with anything resembling the seriousness befitting human persons.

Among the candid advocates for the notion of teacher as witness we find one of modern America’s most influential philosophers, the late Richard Rorty. Rorty is often classified as a postmodernist, but in a strange way, he sounded his own hearty amen to the words of Paul VI. Rorty understood that the teacher must passionately commit himself to what he believes to be true and must do all in his power to form his students according to these truths. Rorty’s witness as teacher lies in his own particular brand of liberal democracy, and he saw the teacher as pivotal in preparing young people for full citizenship in a democratic society.

He lamented the fact that some students are raised by what he calls “racist or fundamentalist” parents (the yoking of these two categories is telling, but must be a subject for another day). Taking Socrates as an example, Rorty insisted that the teacher must inculcate truth and rescue students from error, which for him means actively forming students only in ways beneficial to a democratic polity. And he confesses what he and his colleagues must then profess: “we [professors] are going to go right on trying to discredit you [parents] in the eyes of your children, trying to strip your fundamentalist religious community of dignity, trying to make your views seem silly rather than discussable.”

Professor Rorty understood the notion of “teacher as witness” quite clearly. In principle, his passion was admirable (though in application misguided). He hardly considered himself, as teacher, an objective purveyor of ideas. Rorty’s successors are eager, indeed quite eager, to play the role of witnessing teachers. Yet, tragically, such teachers seem only to allow witnessing as authentic when it forms people to fit into their version of “the earthly city.”

If Rorty’s passion is admirable, it is because education by its very nature presupposes eternity. The university is only coherent insofar as each distinct discipline is understood to be a lens through which the human person can perceive truth and reality. All those disciplines, pursued with the curiosity and passion for truth proper to full persons, lead to ultimate questions about the nature of humanity, creation, and God Himself. It is an unwelcome truth for some scholars, but facts have never interpreted themselves. If the information discovered through a particular discipline “means” something, someone must witness to its significance in the cosmic scheme. And these witnesses who stand before the mystery of existence and speak it we call teachers.

Perhaps this is why Augustine so beautifully notes that all who teach are mere shadows of the one great teacher and witness, our Lord himself. In De Magistro, Augustine insists: “We listen to Truth which presides over our minds within us, though of course we may be bidden to listen by someone using words. Our real Teacher is. . .Christ. . .the unchangeable power and eternal wisdom of God.” Paul VI stood in that tradition and reminded us that the teacher is simply “someone using words” who witnesses to the Word Himself, who is finally The Teacher. And such teachers must always be compelling.


Aaron Urbanczyk teaches English and Philosophy at Southern Catholic College in Dawsonville, Georgia.

(c) 2009 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info at thecatholicthing dot org

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.


Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (5)Add Comment
written by Panda Bear, December 03, 2009
Great! When an orthodox mind harvests the worthwhile in the likes of Rorty. Part of the new evangelization Paul VI et aliis spoke about. One thing: Rorty's probably a bit too Socratic and postmodern to accept the label and notion of a "teacher." And St Augustine's own theories of education were a bit interioristic.

To emerge from modernity's morass, the new evangelization needs ressourcement, which itself needs not only pagan ancients and Christian Fathers but also the scholastic doctors.
It's Greek to me
written by Joseph, December 03, 2009
Socrates seems to be in vogue this week, having been held up in the most recent previous column as a paragon of truth. I seem to recall that he repeatedly said he "knows nothing," and since he left so many questions in the air as to what the chief good in life is, his disciples were left to argue and determine this for themselves, often taking divergent paths. Augustine praised Plato as the greatest of philosophers. Aristotle said truth was greater than his teacher. So who do we listen to? Jesus
editorial note
written by Richard A, December 03, 2009
Ok, I hate to introduce pedantics into this otherwise fine essay, but this is the second column in the last couple weeks in which "reticent" is used when "reluctant" is meant. Could we be just a trifle more careful to use the right word? God was.
great pair
written by Adam, December 03, 2009
Perfect pairing w/ Fr. Schall's previous column. First the realm of philosophy, then academia, and hopefully further discussion of the witness of humane values (and virtue) in praxis - martyrology perhaps?

One regrets that the article never quite arrives at its implied query - what form does the positive witness of the teacher take? The author goes to lengths to describe the "activism" of Rorty as a committed ideologue, but never describes him as living a life that would stand as a witness.
Related Book
written by Magister Christianus, December 07, 2009
You may well enjoy George Steiner's book, Lessons of the Masters. Steiner would agree, as do I...most heartily.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters