The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
The Billionaire Syndrome Print E-mail
By George J. Marlin   
Tuesday, 30 November 2010

A curious syndrome in the modern world is the existence of billionaires spending whatever it takes to buy the power necessary to impose their vision of how the world should work on the rest of us. For example, in my hometown, New York City, Michael Bloomberg has forked out hundreds of millions of dollars to be elected and re-elected mayor, so he can complete his ideological mission to convert the Big Apple into the nation’s leading nanny state.

Bloomberg says, when it comes to same-sex marriage, that “the government should not be in the business of telling people what to do.” He seems unconcerned that if government “approves” gay marriage, it will have the likely effect of telling the large majorities in every state – including churches, synagogues, and mosques – that they are not permitted to disapprove of gay marriage. And he is hardly libertarian when it comes to eating, smoking, or drinking. The mayor, observed social critic David Harsanyi, “embraces almost every freedom-busting, micromanagement machination one could conjure up, from putting extra lights on cars that go off when exceeding the speed limit, to instructing cops to ticket people for talking too loud, to making New York the first city to ban trans fats and pushing one of the most restrictive smoking bans in the nation.”

Billionaire George Soros, who holds that the principles of the Declaration of Independence “are not self-evident truths but arrangements necessitated by our inherently imperfect understanding,” has donated over a billion dollars to his two anti-American initiatives: the Open Society Institute and the Soros Foundation Network. Both organizations (managed by Aryeh Neier, the radical former director of the ACLU) fund causes that will correct what Soros perceives as the “misuses of American power.” Stopping our country’s promotion of representative democracy throughout the world is one of its main goals.

Then there’s billionaire Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, who is funding a crusade to lower the world’s population because he believes giving birth to children is a “potentially disastrous environmental, social, and industrial threat.” To solve global warming, Gates appears to call for sterilization of women of childbearing age. “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproduction health services,” Gates told attendees at a recent Technology, Entertainment, Design (TED) conference, “we could lower [the world’s population] perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

Super-rich elites attempting to dictate who should have the right to procreate is not new. In the early twentieth century, many of America’s Robber Barons, influenced by Herbert Spencer’s Social Darwinism – which called for the elimination of undesirable physical and social traits – advocated intervention in the sex lives of what scientist Karl Pearson called “the propagators of unnecessary human beings.”


      G.K. Chesterton on wealthy do-gooders:
They mistake an ideal for THE ideal.

To preserve their precious Anglo-Saxon race, they financed the pseudo-science of “good birth,” i.e., eugenics:

· The Andrew Carnegie Institute provided $10 million dollars in 1904 for a “eugenics station” at Cold Spring Harbor on the north shore of Long Island. Director Charles Davenport believed behavior is genetic and determined by race. He looked forward to a day “when a woman would no more marry a man without knowing his genetic history than a horse breeder would acquire a stallion without knowing its pedigree.”

·
 Philanthropist Mary Harriman, heir to the E. H. Harriman railroad fortune and sister of New York governor Averell Harriman, financed the Eugenics Record Office to gather hereditary information about the relatives of those deemed defective.

·
 John D. Rockefeller, Jr. (son of the founder of Standard Oil) and George Eastman (founder of Eastman Kodak) financed the American Eugenics Society. In 1926, the Rev. Dr. Kenneth MacArthur, of Sterling, Massachusetts, won the Society’s “Eugenics Sermon Contest” by preaching that moral and spiritual qualities are hereditary.

The interest in eugenics among America’s best and brightest Victorians led to the passage of laws throughout the nation which called for restrictions on childbearing and for the sterilization of a number of groups. They genuinely believed that unrestricted “breeding” by blacks, the poor, and immigrants threatened the dominion of the “civilized races.”

What causes so many wealthy people to believe they can engineer society to their liking? They are driven by the narcissist belief – fortified by legions of well-paid yes men – that they are superior to the rest of the population and, therefore, know best. They are modern Gnostics who lay exclusive claim to the secret truth of the universe and eschatology of man. These would-be “managers of the collective life” expect everyone to be like their employees who snap to attention and blindly follow their orders. For them “government of the people” is merely a slogan to humor the masses.

Because these billionaires have devoted most of their time and energy to building the business endeavors that earned them their fortunes, they often have limited knowledge and understanding of philosophy, theology, and history. Hence, when they approach problems that have perplexed man throughout the ages, they support instant formulas (i.e., population control) concocted by modern day alchemists. G.K. Chesterton got it right a century ago, when he said these “financiers and businessmen are a danger . . . because they can be sentimental about any sentiment and idealistic about any ideal that they find lying about.  . . . These practical men unaccustomed to causes, are always inclined to think that if a thing is proved to be an ideal, it is proved to be the ideal.”

In their search for cure-all bromides, today’s billionaires can easily be enticed to fund crypto-totalitarian ideologues who deny our God-given intrinsic value as persons, seek total control over our lives, and promise their benefactors that “your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods.”

 
George J. Marlin is an editor of The Quotable Fulton Sheen and the author of. The American Catholic Voter.

c) 2010 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The Catholic Thing
is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (11)Add Comment
0
...
written by Paul Hanrahan, November 30, 2010
Great article George. Sums up the eugenic movement nicely.
0
...
written by Fr Tim, December 01, 2010
You are soooo right! This is exactly what is going on in our world now and I am afraid it will make Hitler's eugenics look like a picnic compared to what these people will do. They are aggressively funding every form of "depopulation" experiment out there in the name of "saving" humanity. Aren't they nice.

Problem is.....most people don't believe this is really happening, they cant believe anyone would do such a thing. They live with the blinders of "People are basically good" on and can no longer see reality. Ugh.....
0
...
written by Scott Hesener, December 01, 2010
Well written, Mr. Marlin, and so true. I agree, leaders need the disciplines of philosophy, history and theology and not just business skills. Business can easily fail if important factors are not considered. "To whom much is given, of him will much be required."
0
...
written by Grump, December 01, 2010
And so, thanks to these "philanthropists," we go on marching towards Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World," where "ending is better than mending. The more stitches, the less riches..."

In the year of Stability, A.F. 632...

And around Lenina's waist, she "wore a silver-mounted green morocco-surrogate cartridge belt, bulging with the regulation supply of contraceptives...what a perfect Malthusian belt!"

Meanwhile, there is always "delicious soma" to soothe the seething masses.

"Suffer little children," said the Controller.

"Stability. Stability. The primal and the ultimate need. Stability. Hence all this."

"There was a thing, as I've said before, called Christianity."

"We have the World State now. And Ford's Day celebrations, and Community Sings, and Solidarity Services."

"There was a thing called Heaven; but all the same they used to drink enormous quantities of alcohol... There was a thing called the soul and a thing call immortality... All the advantages of Christianity and alcohol; none of their defects."

"But every one belongs to every one else," Mustapha Mond concluded, citing the hyponaedic proverb.

In the Year of Our Ford: "COMMUNITY, IDENTITY, STABILITY."
0
...
written by Willie, December 01, 2010
Unfortunately the mindset of these elites has entered and perverted our courts, our academic institutions, our executive branch of government and even our Church. This good article should be a warning to the indolent uninformed American populace.
0
...
written by Other Joe, December 01, 2010
Amen Mr. Marlin
0
...
written by Lisa Nicholas, Ph. D., December 01, 2010
Thanks for addressing what should be a hot concern for us all -- the tyranny of plutocrats, which masquerades as "philanthropy." Even genuine philanthropy -- not this sort of disguised narcissism and solipsism -- is problematic, because it loves humanity in the abstract rather than in the concrete, allowing real individuals to suffer for the sake of some putative "greater good for humankind." What the world needs is not philanthropy, but charity, which seeks always the good of one's neighbor -- a very concrete and identifiable individual, not some nebulous abstraction. The problem with the "high and mighty" is that they are so "high and lifted up" that they can't see concrete individuals who live far below them in the ordinary world. If they see us at all, they see us as ants milling around at their feet, whom they can squash without compunction, or even notice. Perhaps this is why the Christian is constantly urged to cultivate humility, which punctures the balloon of arrogance and keeps us grounded!
0
...
written by Martial Artist, December 01, 2010
Mr. Marlin,

In writing "these billionaires have devoted most of their time and energy to building the business endeavors that earned them their fortunes, they often have limited knowledge and understanding of philosophy, theology, and history..." you have missed a few categories of their ignorance. Specifically, anyone who believes that anthropogenic global warming is a threat, is unaware (i.e., ignorant) of physics and unaware of the limitations of numerical models of the atmosphere.

I would also humbly suggest that it is ignorance in the extreme for any human being to so much as seriously entertain the idea "that they are superior to the rest of the population and, therefore, know best." I think Scott Adams was onto something in giving us his Dilbert Principle.

Pax et bonum,
Keith Töpfer
0
...
written by Ray Hunkins, December 01, 2010
Pardon me if I sound a note of caution. Mr. Marlin's piece is interesting and accurate but paints with a broad brush. It is easy to jump on the class warfare bandwagon but perhaps it is neither fair nor accurate. Net worth has little to do with human defects, personality disorders or sin. We all know narcissists who are poor, middle class and, as Mr. Marlin notes there are "billionaires" who fall into that category also. Most of us know good and worthy people from all classes and with widely varying balance sheets.Throughout history totalitarians have come in all shapes, sizes and degrees of wealth. Hitler, the "little corporal" came from rather poor stock and Stalin was a peasant from Georgia before he began his ascent in the Soviet Union. The fact that there are people of wealth who are misguided does not mean all wealthy people are evil or even misguided.
0
...
written by David, Chicago, December 01, 2010
This is exactly the reason why the Bush tax cuts of 2001 should NOT be renewed for the highest income brackets!
0
...
written by Billy Bean, December 01, 2010
Mr. Marlin: You, sir, are right on the money.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Other Articles By This Author

CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner