The Catholic Thing
The Lessons of Howard Stern Print E-mail
By Austin Ruse   
Friday, 17 December 2010

Editor’s Note:
We’re about halfway to our goal, but as we draw near to the end of 2010 all of us need to do our part. You can make it possible for people to continue to read Father Schall in Spanish or Slovak and the whole stable of our regular writers in other languages. You can help us expand our reach with some new initiatives we are developing for 2011 intended to make it easier for people worldwide to get accurate information and commentary about red-blooded Catholicism in one convenient format. And you can help us cut through the fog of ignorance and bigotry that keeps people from hearing even a faint echo of the birth of the Good News that we’re about to celebrate next week. Be a part of all this – and more. Send your support for The Catholic Thing now. – Robert Royal

Five years ago yesterday Howard Stern spent his last day on terrestrial radio. Hasnt it been quiet since then? Prior to his disappearance, hardly a day went by without your morning paper ruined by his latest outrage. He sometimes dominated the national conversation.

For those who blessedly do not remember him, Howard Stern was not the first “shock jock” on radio but he is the one who perfected the vulgar craft. One of his very earliest stunts happened after the Air Florida plane crash into the Potomac River. The day after Stern called Air Florida to price a ticket from National Airport to the 14th Street Bridge, where the plane crashed. He was fired shortly thereafter and decamped to New York City.

Anyone living in New York at that time remembers vividly the sensation Stern became. It seems every car radio in New York was tuned to his show in the morning. His show became a daily guilty pleasure for hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers. Those New Yorkers that did not listen to Stern certainly came to know him in the news and entertainment pages. Frankly, some of it was outrageous fun though it was hard to listen to him for longer than half an hour. His vulgarity seemed almost natural for the times and for New York. When a Philadelphia station picked up his show in 1986, however, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reported more complaints in three months than in the previous three years in New York.

Even with complaints pouring in, Stern went from strength to strength. He gained listeners and eventually syndicated his show all over the country. He experimented with television. He wrote books. He called himself the “King of All Media.” But all of this rested on his ongoing assault on the sensibilities of middle America, his ability to shock the bourgeoisie and annoy those with broadcast regulatory power.

Calling Air Florida and mocking an airplane crash, however, did not get Stern into FCC trouble. That was juvenile and a sick joke but still acceptable for broadcast. Where Stern got increasingly into trouble was over sex. In 1986 a Philadelphia mother complained that her son heard a Stern broadcast that talked about breast and penis size, sexual intercourse and bestiality. Stern told one called that he had been “sodomized by the television puppet Lamb Chop” and joked about sex with Aunt Jemima. After the 1999 shooting spree at Columbine High School Stern wondered why the shooters did not first have sex with the women they killed.

In the beginning the FCC said it felt hamstrung. A 1985 statement claimed, “our role in overseeing program content is. . .very limited. . .the First Amendment protects the right of broadcasters to air statements which may be offensive, and a free society requires governmental forbearance in those instances.” In response to the Philadelphia complaint, however, the FCC decided to get tougher and begin enforcing nearly moribund standards. In a unanimous vote, the commissioners found that Stern “dwelled on sexual and excretory matters in a way that was patently offensive.” The FCC broadened its definition of what qualifies as obscene to include “language or material that depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory activity or organs.” Stern’s response was to hold a huge rally in New York where he thumbed his nose at the FCC.

In 1990, the fines started coming. Six thousand dollars against Infinity Broadcasting, $105,000 in 1992 against Great Media and then two fines totally $1.1 million against Infinity in 1992 and 1993. By 2004, stations or companies that carried Stern’s show were fined a total of $2.5 million, the largest ever against a single show.

In 2005, Stern announced he was leaving terrestrial radio to join Sirius Satellite radio for a reported $100 million per year over five years. Or course, this made national news. Howard made a bundle and he went off to the new media that would greet him with no censorship at all. But then something happened. He really was not heard from again. And thereby hangs a tale for the age of electronic communications.

Sure you can find him in his gilded ghetto on Sirius but their total subscriber base is only 20 million. His personal audience is only a tiny subset of the total. Because of that, no one really cares. He is not in the public consciousness. He is mostly not in the press. His new contract was announced in newspapers yesterday, one carried it in a small article on the bottom of the third business page. For all intents and purposes, Stern is gone from our culture.

What happened to Stern is rather like what happened to dissident theologian Charles Curran. Curran was booted out of Catholic University of American, declared a Catholic theologian no longer. He decamped to a Methodist university and hardly anyone cares what he thinks or says anymore, only the mouth breathers of far left Catholicism. 

Stern led to the revival of another good public policy idea, driving the trash back into a ghetto. Would you make this trade? All porn forever leaves your Internet service provider, your cable pay-per-view, leaves all forms of mass public distribution. In exchange, it is allowed to move back into clearly defined red-light districts from which it may not wander. This would not preclude prosecution for obscenity; that must increase and take new forms to keep up with the e-threat. But everything else should just go somewhere out of our sight, like Howard Stern. The world would be a better place.  


Austin Ruse
is the President of the New York and Washinton, D.C.-based Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), a research institute that focuses exclusively on international social policy. The opinions expressed here are Mr. Ruse’s alone and do not necessarily reflect the policies or positions of C-FAM.

©2010 The Catholic Thing.
All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (8)Add Comment
written by John, December 17, 2010
It's true that Stern thankfully has been marginalized to the outer fringes of depravity, although Sirius just rewarded him with a five-year, nine-figure deal -- another sign of the Apocalypse perhaps. Apologies to the late, great Leslie Nielsen, but "Surely you can't be Sirius."

It says a lot about America's philistine culture that Stern's popular interview technique boiled down to asking women what their cup sizes were and drawing big yuks from his deranged audience.

Austin, a larger theme you may wish to develop is the notion that the merger between "news" and "entertainment" is now consummated whereas once they were separate components of society.

Articles such as yours are not only illuminating about the so-called civilization in which we live but always seem to prompt me to go back to re-reading portions of Spengler's The Decline of the West. It is indeed almost winter in America, by the calendar, and in the more metaphorical sense.

Back to Stern. If there is one thing to look forward to it is his promised retirement from the airwaves in 2015 when, barring the need for more big paychecks, another disgusting voice will disappear.
written by Dan Deeny, December 17, 2010
I would like to read your articles in French, German, and Spanish. How can I do that? Thank you.
En Francais
written by Bradford Miner, December 17, 2010
You can start here:
-Brad Miner
written by Lee Gilbert, December 17, 2010
What I cannot understand is the lack of Christian zeal in this situation and many like it.

Both police and soldiers understand the concept of overwhelming force, but we Christians do not. For example, in my little town of 30,000 there are maybe 14 police officers on duty at any one time. And so when they deal with criminals, they make it a very memorable experience for them so they never have to deal with them again.

The airwaves belong to the public, of which Christians constitute a very large portion. When something like Stern comes on, we should not just complain to the FCC and be content with millions in fines. We should immediately go after the license of the broadcaster and not rest till we get it pulled. We should be adamant, implacable, loud, unrelenting. Yes, we should go to "extremes." Stern certainly does. The NYT does. Assange does. With the result that they move the culture.

We only whine and make ourselves look stupid.

If our implacable organized pushback resulted in one licesne getting pulled, no network official would think about putting on Stern or anyone like him ever again. However, we in our our so-called Christian charity will never do this. We like getting pushed around and the guilty pleasure of being swamped with filth.
written by Austin Ruse, December 17, 2010
Licenses can only be pulled by the FCC and only after citizen complaints that are not rectified. He was hounded by citizens acting just as you call for...
written by Bill, December 17, 2010
This is a very timely and well crafted article, Mr. Ruse. You are correct, in my opinion, that a certain day, whether sexual in nature or of theological dissent, has come and gone. I read years ago that managers of small stations in the networks made a "command decision", without any complaints, to terminate their reception of Stern's broadcasts, even though the "Brass" complained. Who wants to hear/see freaks and degenerates being asked what they think?
written by Emily M. Fincher, December 18, 2010
Another great article! If only everyone could read your last paragraph and the homosexuals and the abortionists would go away with Howard Stern and leave us Christians alone. But I guess that has to wait for heaven. Keep up the good work. May the mother of our Lord forever bless you.
written by Billy Bean, December 19, 2010
Yes, Mr. Ruse, I would make that trade. I think it might be the best solution for modern democracies. The pornographers and shock jocks are thereby not censored, so no one could say their First Amendment rights had been violated. They would be free to speak and publish within the confines of their ghettos, and the rest of us would be free not to look or listen. That, after all, is what the secularists have been trying to do to traditional and orthodox religious advocates for some time now.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


Other Articles By This Author