The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
Moments to be Seized, Work to Be Done Print E-mail
By Hadley Arkes   
Tuesday, 01 February 2011

The thirty-eighth anniversary of Roe v. Wade. There is a surge of hope and renewed conviction with the March for Life in Washington, as people see the signs all about them.   The surveys show a majority in the country moving to the pro-life side, but the new year also brings a pro-life House of Representatives, with the new Republican members even more firmly pro-life. 

Suddenly, initiatives that had been foreclosed under the Democratic House become possible again, and they are springing up across the board: bills to remove the funding of abortion in any system of national health care, to restore protections of “conscience” to doctors and nurses who do not wish to be compelled to participate in abortions, to give women the chance to see on a screen the child whose killing they are about to order.  

And yet, even with this new surge of possibilities there are some curious tricks-of-the-eye distracting even the sight of pro-lifers.   We still hear the talk that one can only chip at the periphery until the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade. That state of mind has people backing into the assumptions of judicial supremacy. And what is blocked from view is the fact that the political branches have ever borne a responsibility in construing the Constitution, which may express itself at times in countering or reshaping the judgments of the courts.  
 

People seem not to be aware that the Supreme Court, with John Roberts and Samuel Alito, has now brought us to a new point: Initiatives coming from the Congress, the Executive, and the states may have a powerful effect in scaling back the practice of abortion.  The Court is in a position now to sustain these measures, step by step. With each step, lives are saved, and as Roe is cut back, step-by-step, the time will come when it may be toppled, at last, with the gentlest push.   In the meantime, the rest of us have work to do, and with the new Congress that work has already begun.


          Dr. Kermit Gosnell: Abortionist

Another trick-of-the-eye has come with the breaking news of Dr. Kermit Gosnell, indicted by a grand jury in Philadelphia, for severing the spinal cords of seven babies who had survived an abortion in his “clinic.” He is accused also of causing the death of a woman overdosed on anesthetic while awaiting the abortion. 

“Clinic” hardly fitted the term for his establishment, in a state of filth, smelling of urine, furniture stained with blood, disposable medical supplies used again, and with instruments not exactly sterilized. But apart from the indictment in Philadelphia, what about a federal ground for prosecution? One friend in a law school asked, “Why don’t we have a cause of action under the Partial-Birth Abortion Act?” 

But there was the trick- of-the-eye: This was not a partial-birth abortion; this was the killing of a child who had survived an abortion. Were our friends forgetting? We had passed the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (2002) precisely to deal with the problem at this level, the hardest for the partisans of abortion to defend. 

But here’s the rub: The bill was brought forth in July 2000, when Bill Clinton was still President. Charles Canady of Florida, chairing a panel of the Judiciary Committee, thought it prudent to remove the penalties from the bill for the sake of avoiding a veto. Besides, the purpose of the bill was to teach by planting premises, and it would be purer in that respect if it threatened no penalties. 

Then how would it be enforced? If a hospital or clinic were found to deliver babies alive and then kill them, it would be in violation of federal law and could potentially lose federal funds. But when a serious case arose in New Jersey, the process was so cumbersome that the case simply ground down in procedural snarls. 

And so this is precisely the moment for the next phase in teaching: This news about Dr. Gosnell is too jolting, even for the partisans of abortion, and the moment should not be wasted. This is the magic time to hold hearings in the House, to hear the testimony of how common in fact it has become to deliver babies alive and let them die, and to put the question directly: What should the penalties be for a doctor who kills a baby born alive, following an abortion?  

We will hear that the bill is unnecessary because the killings of Dr. Gosnell are being prosecuted in Philadelphia. But the purpose of having Congress fill out its work here is to remind us all that Congress can indeed legislate on abortion – and legislate in a manner that actually bars the practice of abortion. 

When Charles Canady left the Congress, Steve Chabot of Ohio took his place as chairman of the panel of the Judiciary Committee dealing with the bill. He became the sponsor of the bill, and he was there when President Bush signed it into law. Chabot lost his seat in 2008, but he regained it in 2010. He is back again. And who better to take up the mandate?   I would ask our readers who may know-someone-who-knows-someone, to help me in getting the word to Steve Chabot, in a loving appeal: 

Steve, this is your moment – and the work you can do better than anyone else. May we not lament our failure to get it done.


Hadley Arkes
is the Ney Professor of Jurisprudence at Amherst College. His most recent book is 
Constitutional Illusions & Anchoring Truths: The Touchstone of the Natural Law

© 2011 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  

The Catholic Thing
is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (6)Add Comment
0
...
written by debby, February 01, 2011
a personal appeal to all my TCT brothers and sisters in our Lord Jesus Christ,
so many in the past years have posted "Pro-Life" comments on this site. can i ask that all those who have a desire to see Life respected in our culture and country join me in a specific fast to Our Lady, Patroness of America, for Steve Chabot? can we join together and pray for his moral fortitude to be supernaturally strengthened by Her, Our Lady of Grace, and that God's will be done through such an unlikely vessel as a US Congressman? Feb 11th is Our Lady of Lourdes (tomorrow is the Presentation but maybe that's too soon for many to join together.) Some spirits are only defeated through prayer AND fasting. Let's help this Congressman and all those who govern us.
0
...
written by Jo the Housewife, February 01, 2011
Has anyone ever called it what it is: Murder for Hire...?
0
...
written by Nicholas Mercy, February 02, 2011
I find it curious that you can advocate bring a child to term in all cases on one hand... and on the other if that child turns out to be gay to do everything in your power to either at best force that child to lie and live a life of loneliness or at worst encourage that child to end their own life. When you rob people of their very reasons to live... when you constantly try to reinforce in these childrens' minds that they are somehow less than human and less deserving of the same right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness just because they are different... are you any different than the doctor who aborts a child? Whats the difference between aborting a child before birth and making another human being feel like they aren't good enough to live and thus contribute to them ending their own life. Is it because you didn't dirty your hands with the killing blow that you don't think you are responsible in any way for that person's death? I can assure you that you are mistaken.
0
...
written by Fr. Vincent Fitzpatrick, Fargo, N.D., February 02, 2011
For 38 years, every single governor of every state has offered blind obedience in response to the Supreme Court's abortion decisions. Those decisions attempt (so far, with complete success) to coerce the states to withhold the protection of the law from a certain class of human beings.

The Supreme Court, in other words, has commanded that the states practice discrimination. And the governors have unanimously given this command blind obedience--both of which (unjust discrimination and blind obedience) are condemned by Catholic teaching.

And yet, only about fifteen bishops in the U.S. are behaving as if practicing this form of discrimination is a mortal sin. That is, only about fifteen bishops are obeying Canon 915--disobedience to which is ALWAYS grave matter--i.e., a mortal sin.

The lawlessness is epidemic. It is eating the heart out of the Catholic Church in America.
0
...
written by Fr. Vincent Fitzpatrick, Fargo, N.D., February 02, 2011
Three experts who throw light on issues related to Canon 915:

Cardinal Raymond Burke demonstrates that disobedience to Canon 915 is, without exception, grave matter.

The Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts shows that the decision to deny Communion, in obedience to Canon 915, belongs to the pastor of the local congregation. I.e., it is absurd to say that a bishop can have a "policy" in his diocese that Canon 915 is to be disobeyed. No bishop has the authority to mandate disobedience by his priests, any more than he has the authority to disobey it himself.

Canon lawyer Edward N. Peters comments on Canon 915 and current issues.
0
...
written by blue8064, February 15, 2011
The Republican party is not pro-life either. The main reason for that is their support for a policy denying an increase in welfare payments to unmarried welfare mothers who have more children while on welfare (the family cap). Such a policy implicitly tells welfare mothers to abort their babies instead of allowing them to be born, and is therefore pro-abortion. On the other hand, working families have dependency exemptions and child tax credits to help them with raising children.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Other Articles By This Author

CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US