The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
Politics and Truth Print E-mail
By James V. Schall, S. J.   
Tuesday, 05 April 2011

In Jesus of Nazareth (II), Benedict recounts the conversation of Pilate and Jesus at His trial. “Pilate asks Him: ‘What is truth?’ (Jn. 18:38). It is the question that is also asked by modern political theory: Can politics accept truth as a structural category? Or must truth, as something unattainable, be relegated to the subjective sphere, its place taken by an attempt to build peace and justice using whatever instruments are available to power?” (191)

Even though our founding document speaks about “self-evident” truths, they are rarely held to be so. Truth is pictured as “imposing” something like “dogma” on those who are free to “choose” whatever they will. The essence of man is “choice,” not reason and nature. In practice, modern polities, including our own, are not based on truth, but on its denial, or impossibility.

Tolerance no longer means allowing or insisting on peaceful discussion among differing positions. A positive intolerance is directed to any claim to truth as potentially “totalitarian.” “Democracy” is built on skepticism, not truth. Human dignity means human autonomy. We rightly choose not only about life and death but about the validity of first principles themselves. Relativism in all its forms rejects truth.

In this context, no conflict can be resolved. Controversialists cannot understand one another in terms each mutually grasps. For that to happen, what is necessary is a common, objective world in which we all live and on the basis of which we all agree. Conflicts are now decided instead by power, mutually agreeing that nothing is true, and indifference to the consequences of our acts. The desire for truth is an illusion. Its specter subverts polities that have chosen to live without it.

The question Benedict asked was whether truth could be a “structural category?” That is, does it make any public difference that something is true and something else false? If we say that it does make a difference, then we are denying the “rights” of those who are “wrong.” It is not so much that what is wrong has its own dire consequences. Rather such consequences cannot be admitted as evidence of wrongness. We just eliminate or ignore them. The “structure” of democracy does not allow it. It violates the “rights’ and “dignity” of those said to be in error.

Following Socrates, our civilization is built on the proposition that “it is never right to do wrong.” Obviously, if no distinction exists between right and wrong, the Socratic principle, found also in Christianity, makes no sense.

“What is truth?” – Pilate’s question to Christ – is perceptive and prophetic. Truth should be the primary subject of meditation of any politician. Pilate stated that no truth could be found in the accusations against Christ. To turn around and deny truth as a general principle means that Pilate realized that he had to justify the contradiction between his own knowledge and his action. This “resolution” is usually accomplished when some “theory” is called in to allow the politician to cover his tracks.

Thus, if we say that the man is innocent, then turn around and allow him to be killed, we fall back on the vacuous principle that truth is unattainable. And if it is unattainable, we cannot be bound by it. Yet Pilate was a Roman governor. The man before him was there because the Romans had the judicial power to acquit or condemn. The Romans prided themselves on their justice. Pilate was not deaf to its appeal. He “found no charge” in the man.

What might a polity be like in which truth was a “structural category?” First, it would be a polity that used names correctly. The opposite of truth is a lie. The worst thing that can happen to us, Plato memorably said, is to have a “lie in our souls about the things that are.” Plato recognized that we could lie to ourselves to enable us to do what we want.

The second structural principle is that truth is not something we simply create for ourselves. Truth is not the conformity of our minds to what we want. Rather it is the conformity of our minds with what is. Much modern thought teaches us that if anything is “out there,” we cannot be sure of it. Certainly, it has no order that implies a source. Even more certainly, we cannot find out what we are or what we ought to be from a reality that we did not ourselves create.

But we are not the cause of our own creation. The truth of what we are is for us to discover, to encounter, not for us to fashion what we are. Our end consists not in what we choose for ourselves, but in whether we choose the purpose implicit in our being. On this basis, truth and politics belong to one another.

James V. Schall, S.J., a professor at Georgetown University, is one of the most prolific Catholic writers in America. His most recent book is The Mind That Is Catholic.

© 2011 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own
.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (5)Add Comment
0
...
written by Anonymous please, April 05, 2011
Thank you, Father Schall. Beyond politics, does not the Magisterium continuously need to make explicit that Catholic doctrine is objectively true? Is that not a requirement of evangelization and catechesis in the dictatorship of relativism? For example, the new theology curriculum that the U. S. Bishops have promulgated for Catholic high schools nowhere requires students to be taught that the curriculum is objectively true. This omission not only fails to take on the dictatorship of relativism, but also gives room to manuever to the legion of relativists in "Catholic" high school faculties and administrations.
0
...
written by Ray Hunkins, April 05, 2011
As long as there are teachers teaching the truth, there will be students learning the truth. As long as there are writers writing the truth, there will be people reading the truth. Thank you Father Schall for your work in these important endeavors. You are in my prayers.
0
...
written by Dave Pezzini, April 05, 2011
Thank you, Father Schall, for reminding us that this - the elemental foundation of all God's creations - should be #1 on the endangered species list.
0
...
written by Louise, April 05, 2011
Thank you, Fr. Schall,

Where there is no Truth, there can be no trust, and where there is no trust, there can be only chaos.

Belloc lists the attack on "the Good, the Beautiful, and the True' as a hallmark of the heresy that he calls "The Modern Phase." And we are certainly living in that time, aren't we. I am reminded of a horrifying scene, perhaps it was in "The Phantom of the Opera", where a man is caught in a circular room with only mirrors on the wall, and he doesn't know which mirror is attached to the door, so he doesn't know how to get out. it is really quite terrifying to watch.
0
...
written by Pete, April 10, 2011
The essence of man is not distinguished from animal when based on choice, which in turn on feelings, senses and insticts. It is rational reason that separates the two.

Pople Benedict XVI is the star on Jesus and his reasoning is purifies Jesus from the Church among the Scribes and Pharisees..

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Other Articles By This Author

CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner