The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
The Mystery of Charity Print E-mail
By Robert Royal   
Monday, 26 December 2011

The most disturbing comment about Christianity I’ve ever come across is not from the scientific materialists or the New Atheists – or even the Older Atheists. It’s from a French Catholic, Charles Péguy, a figure not well known here, but of a spiritual stature akin to Dostoyevsky.

Péguy put the comment in a play that’s mostly a dialogue between a nun and the thirteen-year old Joan of Arc set in 1425, which is to say after Joan has begun to have visions, but before she leaves her little village of Domrémy and, miraculously, goes on – a simple peasant girl – to lead the French king and his army to victory over the English.

The comment is short and simple, and refers to the ages, as she sees them, since Christ: “the greatest physician in the world has passed by, and nothing has changed.”

Every thinking Christian has felt this at times. Compared to this inner sense that we’re still left grappling with our sins, the charges about Christian complicity in the Crusades, the Inquisitions, or the Wars of Religion are just historical abstractions.

And they could be balanced out, anyway, by the cathedrals, the paintings and statues and music, the worldwide relief services, and the hospitals and universities (the last two, both Christian inventions).

And the saints. Christian saints are often thought to be bland, predictable, and boring. Christian outlets that perpetuate these insipid portraits bear some of the blame – but be it said, even the plaster saints attest to something unusual in human nature.

Today, December 26, is the Feast of St. Stephen, the first martyr. The Church calendar places him right after Christmas Day. With good reason:  Christ came into the world and redeemed us alright, but the Redemption immediately begins a process that challenges the usual worldly powers, which the world does not like, and reacts violently against, in every age. It’s still going on – in China, Africa, the Middle East, and in lesser forms almost everywhere.

Christians and non-Christians alike have grown too used to the idea of martyrs and saints to see them for what they actually are. In the ancient world, however, they were rightly thought something remarkable.

       The Greco-Roman physician Galen (129-199 A.D.) was, like many scientists, a skeptic. But he was stunned at how Christianity produced many people willing to die – peacefully – for what they believe is the truth. It was a commonplace in the ancient world that common people were incapable of such virtue, and only the rarest philosophers – Socrates, most notably – could achieve that self-mastery.


        Joan of Arc by Jules Bastien-Lepage (1879)    

But beginning with St. Stephen, the “protomartyr” (Acts 6 & 7), a new relationship to the truth of things emerged even among common people. No one died to attest to the truth of Zeus or Athena, Marduk or Baal. But ordinary Christians will accept martyrdom for the truth that a divine child came into the world.

       So what of our poor Joan of Arc, dismayed over general lukewarmness and sin and outright blasphemies in 1425 on a hillside in what is today known as Domrémy-la-Pucelle, in the Vosges region of France, a real village that you can still visit, not a fairytale kingdom?

In the play I’ve quoted from, Péguy’s The Mystery of the Charity of Joan of Arc, she reflects on how Jesus was born among simple people, like her neighbors. And she can see how much a person like Jesus, simple himself in many respects, would both win their deep loyalty and also be feared because of the vast disturbances to a familiar life that he would set going.

     She sees that the whole sad history of Christianity is precisely this working out of the two reactions. And she comes to two conclusions:  that the world needs a war to be carried out “to kill war” and that God needs “a saint, who will succeed.”

The rest of her story is too well known to need much mention here. The swift passage from her village to meeting Charles VII and persuading him to fight for France. Her “voices” and successful battles. The way, at only nineteen, she was tortured and condemned by an ecclesiastical court to be burned alive by the English at Rouen. And her exoneration, only twenty-five years later, by Pope Callixtus III, who declared her a martyr. (Christians martyred by other Christians are a frequent enough occurrence.) She was canonized in 1920.

Péguy doesn’t bother with any of this, though. His subject is the mystery of charity, its strange gestation in a human heart, which, in Joan’s case, expressed itself in acts that changed the history of several nations.

Among those acts are deeds of war. We don’t like to think about it, but what we often regard as merely the same old violent conflicts of human history contain real struggles between good and evil. There can sometimes be heroism, even happy deaths, of a sort, in a just war that seeks to protect and enhance life.

Joan’s charity was born in the heart of an ordinary – indeed, by our modern standards, extraordinarily simple – person with no advanced degrees, no theological training, no foundation grants, none of the elaborate preparation we think needed to do something great in life.

And yet she succeeded. Like Christ succeeded. Not on the strength of arms or brilliance, but through charity, which is to say in reaction to the intolerable situation during her life in which it seemed Christ came “and nothing changed.”

But lots changed. And continues to change. Still, the struggles won’t end until the end of the world and His Second Coming.

Christianity seems weak just now, as it seemed in 1425 to a peasant girl, and might seem in every age. But whether it is really weak and incapable of meeting the challenges of the time depends less on what we think constitutes strength and much more on the strength of real charity.             


Robert Royal is editor-in-chief of The Catholic Thing, and president of the Faith & Reason Institute in Washington, D.C. His most recent book is
The God That Did Not Fail: How Religion Built and Sustains the West, now available in paperback from Encounter Books.

© 2011 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (9)Add Comment
0
...
written by Manfred, December 26, 2011
I would dispute Peguy's description of Christ as a "physician" and I could understand the disappointment that "nothing had changed". One must go to Gen. 3:15 where the Lord says to the serpent (Satan, who has just seduced Adam and Eve)I will put enmity between the seed of the Woman and your seed and He will crush your head and you will strike at His heel. We are in a cosmic war which will endure until the end of the world. Do not forget that one of the "coatholders" of the men stoning St. Stephen was Saul, who was to become St. Paul, probably the greatest apostle of the Church.
I have been to the Loire valley, including Chinon castle where Joan met the dauphin. Her mission was Divine in origin as the voices she heard were those of Saints who guided her. At Chinon, in order to test her, she was introduced to the "dauphin". Joan turned and walked over to a young male "servant" who was in fact the dauphin in mufti.
The "ecclestical court" were Burgundian Catholic bishops who betrayed her to the English who burned her at the stake. That is how one knows Joan's life and death were truly Catholic as evil is continually opposing good, even in the life of this simple instrument who finally wins it all by her reward of eternity with God and the Saints who guided her.
0
...
written by Robert Royal, December 26, 2011
Manfred, I don't know what religion you practice, but the Catholic Church has a long history of thinking of Christ as a physician. Cf. "He hath sent me to heal the broken-hearted" (Luke 4:18).

And this from one of Augustine's sermons among the innumerable places where Augustine and other Church Fathers use that image:

"If God, the heavenly doctor in charge of us, said to you, 'Do you want to be cured?' wouldn’t you say, 'O yes! I do!' Or perhaps you wouldn’t say it, because you think you are perfectly well, and that means your illness is worse than ever."
0
...
written by Manfred, December 26, 2011
Thank you for your fraternal correction, Dr. Royal. I missed the jump between St. Stephen's day and Peguy's play. With all that has happened since Joan's time (circa 1430) and today, I might share Peguy's despair.
0
...
written by kendallpeak, December 26, 2011
But much has changed. In the past, not only in Rome, but throughout the world, organized evil proudly showed it's feathers with public mass killings and ritual sacrifices. There is now a great light in the world, and even the Hitlers and Stalins, while they still exist, try to hide their deeds in the dark.
0
...
written by Grump, December 26, 2011
I'm with Peguy. Man remains the despicable creature he has been since the Fall. Nothing has changed.
0
...
written by GABRIEL, December 26, 2011
We are not weak.

We are just under attack from every direction.

Same as it ever was.
0
...
written by Thomas C. Coleman, Jr., December 27, 2011
@kendallpeak: While some of the demons might be hiding some of their deeds, some need not even try, for they have their apologists in what was once Christendom who excuse not only the slaughters of decades ago as a necessary cracking of eggs for the millenial omelete but also those of today as understandable reactions to such events as the Crusades (see Presdient Clinton's surreal remarks soon after 9/11). While I know that just-war-theory is not the theme of Dr. Royals article, it nonetheless reminds me, as does the Miracle of Lepanto, that the end of war will only come with the Second Coming andthat those who in the meantime want what is left of Christendom to disarm are either horribly naive or in the serivce of the serpent written of in Genesis 3:15.
0
...
written by Z, January 01, 2012
I am not sure who it was who EVER thought that foundations and grants make 'heroes'. This comment is nonsensical. In the last 150 years alone we have had St Bernadette of Lourdes who spoke a low Patois, which Our Lady graciously shared with her, and if you wish to believe it, a barely educated Portuguese shepherd boy from a remote hill town, who could barely learn his Catechism. Oh, and before those two, we had Maximin (another tiny shepherd) and Melanie of La Salette, maybe semi-literate, not to mention Faustina Kowalska, who was a rough and ready Polish peasant. And wjhat did we get from Harvard? BF Skinner and, far more dreadful, the Rotenburg Foundation; you really have to look up Judge 'Rotten-burg', because if you don't you will never believe how his trainers are electric-shocking kids in America, right now, TODAY.
0
...
written by Robert Royal, January 02, 2012
Z, that was a bit of humor, meant to make the same point you did. Re-read the passage - and smile,

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Other Articles By This Author

CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US