The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
On Christian Humanism Print E-mail
By James V. Schall, S.J.   
Tuesday, 04 September 2012

Our deepest thanks to every single one of our readers who responded to our funding appeal yesterday. The donations began to come in from Europe during the middle of the night (East Coast time), and then started to appear from across the country, Canada, and into the Pacific – mirroring the reach of this site. This is going to be a hard year for us and we also appreciate that the size of individual donations are a bit larger than in the past, which is quite frankly going to be crucial to our future. Our large donors have had to pull back a little this year and we’re going to have to rely on many more individual donations than ever before. As we announced yesterday, in addition to the high-quality columns we bring you every day, we’re starting a series of longer essays tomorrow by George Marlin on the Catholic vote in key swing states this election year. Wisconsin is coming first. One friend of this site wrote that he owed it to us “in justice” to do his fair share for work that brings him so much. How about you? Can you do your part and contribute $50, $100, $500, or more to our efforts? We’re not just talking when we say that you are a crucial part of our work, especially this year. So, please. Do the right thing. Contribute to
The Catholic Thing today. – Robert Royal
 

For many, the stranger claim of Christianity is that, with the existence of faith and grace, with the Incarnation and its effects, man can be more, not less, human, more, not less, complete in the being he is intended to be.

He is, in short, more himself, provided he lives by reason, faith, and the virtues. If he does not, he will likely turn into the opposite of what he ought to be. Both faith and reason are gifts. In that sense, as we know by introspection, we do not cause ourselves to be or to be what we are.

Terms like “atheist” or “secular” humanism describe the alternatives to Christianity. They generally imply that faith is “alien” to man. Either it demands too much and, therefore, it is inhuman, or it claims that man is not completed by his own powers. He requires something superhuman even to be human. He is therefore a plaything of the gods and not his own master.

No doubt, if we look at human history in every time and place, we see how difficult it is for man to avoid disorders of soul and body. His inhumanity is often more graphic to us than his goodness. One strategy to deal with this unpleasant, yet recurring, fact of human vice is to call vices virtues.

Another way is to blame the disorders on religion itself. This strategy goes back to Epicurus and regularly recurs in human history, including today. Get rid of religion and everything will be dandy.

Experience cautions us, however. The atheisms and secularisms that have gained power have usually turned out to be the most anti-human regimes. This experience ought to deter us, but it does not always seem to. Likewise, not every religion turns out to be also human. Religion is not an univocal term.

Recently, I received an e-mail from a Marine Corps officer. He told me that often in his experience the most vehement opposition to natural law and reason came from chaplains. Some thought that the use and place of reason in religion indicated lack of trust in God or Scripture.

Logically, this view would mean that no Christian “humanism” exists but only Christian faith. Muslim faith is pretty much like this also. If it is not in the Book, it is not relevant. God can always do the opposite of what He commanded before. Human reason and Logos do not mix.

Catholicism, for its part, argues that both reason and faith derive from the same source. They do not contradict each other but reinforce each other. Benedict XVI speaks of faith healing and encouraging reason. Thus, Catholicism manifests a confidence in reason, even when its implications are political and culturally denied.

The pope worked much of this out in his Regensburg Lecture. Christianity was from the beginning directed to the philosophers, not to other religions. Christianity is eager to know what the world makes of itself, how it explains human life and its existence in the cosmos. When it considers such issues, Christianity finds that human life has its own reality that it does not “create” but receives.

The Swiss philosopher, Martin Rhonheimer, argues that Christianity is a salvation ethics and morality. By this he means that we are to observe both the natural law and the prescriptions of faith directed to our reason.

Even if the culture is depraved in one or another way, Christians should still follow, in private and public, the Socratic prescription: “It is never right to do wrong.” Efforts of proportionalism or consequentism to mitigate what Nietzsche called “the tension” between faith and autonomous choice result, not in fostering, but in harming what it is to be human.

When we understand that our ethical and political lives are themselves salvation-oriented, we do not mean to establish a Kingdom of God in this world, but to indicate the real locus and end of each human life. This recognition is why, in agreement with Plato, Benedict keeps reminding us of a final judgment that pronounces on how we have actually lived.

A Christian humanism is one that is directed to the virtues. But living virtuously also is directed to achieving our transcendent end. Intellectually, what Christian thought recognizes is that each case of not living virtuously is, in fact, a deviation from reason fully healed and understood.

All of the things that Christian attention to reason and revelation recommend are in fact what “true humanism,” to recall Jacques Maritain’s phrase, is about. In the public order today, what thinkers like Hadley Arkes, Robert George, J. Budziszewski, Russell Hittinger, and numerous others are noted for is not their faith but their reason.

That is, the logic of opposition to the basic truths of reason and faith turns out to be, at each point, incoherent, unreasonable, not fully human.

 

James V. Schall, S.J., a professor at Georgetown University, is one of the most prolific Catholic writers in America. His most recent books are
 
The Mind That Is Catholic and The Modern Age.
 
 
The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (3)Add Comment
0
...
written by Jack,CT, September 04, 2012
Enjoyed very much, thanks!
0
...
written by G.K. Thursday, September 04, 2012
I cannot donate at this point due to my impoverished means. But I do promise to pray for the continued success of the Catholic Thing.
0
...
written by Tom Drake-Brockman, February 18, 2013
I see several problems with this position from a humanist perspective.
1. Faith without empirical evidence is irrational and potentially dangerous
2. While the conventional (Judeo) Christian ethic is admirable and enormously benefited the societies it has infused, it is no where near enough to transform our tormented world to the degree a true humanist would seek.As a Judaic humanist, Christ's compassion and thirst for justice went far beyond what Christianity has or could ever achieve.
3. Christianity will always have these constraints on its humanism as long as it upholds any vestige of the salvation through faith doctrine. The basically free 'pie in the sky' will always prove an effective distraction for most people from the urgent needs of humanity in crisis.

The Christian humanism I embrace focuses on the early Jewish Christians, their intense compassion & commitment to justice.
(http://christianhumanism.webs.com/) Like Plato they seemed to believe we will be judged entirely by our works, not in the immediate afterlife but after many reincarnated lifetimes. In that context, faith would grow out of empirical evidence, the fruits of our compassion in terms of reduced human suffering and a more stable world.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Other Articles By This Author

CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner