The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
Two Cheers for Pro-Life Europe Print E-mail
By Austin Ruse   
Friday, 27 January 2012

Most Americans, particularly political conservatives, would be shocked to learn that pagan Europe is often better than Christian America on the life issues. We typically think Europe is exponentially further out on the pelvic left. On some issues – like homosexual marriage – they are. But on the life issues, not so much.

Two European countries, Malta and Ireland, outlaw abortion outright. In countries where abortion is legal, they have gestational limits on abortion that would give Leroy Carhart an aneurism. European gestational limits would put Carhart’s partial-birth abortion practice into immediate receivership. And good riddance.

On cloning, European sensibilities and laws are far better than here. A conservative state like Missouri allows for cloning of human beings as long as they are embryos killed for their stem cells. Such a thing would be anathema in Germany and other countries over there.

What about physician-assisted suicide? It is legal in Washington, Oregon, and Montana, but is allowed almost everywhere else in the United States where patients, now routinely, have their feeding tubes removed. While it is fully legal in the Netherlands, there have been numerous reports in the European press, which is just as liberal as here but honest on the issue, of massive abuses towards those who are put down without asking for it. But breaking news out of the Council of Europe shows that, on this creepy practice of “mercy killings,” the true heart of Europe beats more with Catholic Social Teaching than with the Third Reich.

A coalition led by the remarkable Italian MP Luca Volonté has managed to get a resolution passed out of the Parliament Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) that says, “euthanasia must always be banned.”

So, what is the Council of Europe? It is forty-seven member states dedicated to protecting the rights established by the European Convention on Human Rights. Don’t confuse it with the so-called European Institutions that purport to rule twenty-seven European states from shiny new buildings in Brussels. Don’t feel bad if you didn’t already know that. Even Europeans get confused about this plethora of largely non-democratic bodies.

The PACE resolution, which passed just two days ago, sets the rather startling principle that “Euthanasia, in the sense of intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or his alleged benefit, must always be prohibited.” That might seem obvious enough but try to get a similar declaration out of the U.S. Congress. 


             Italian MP Luca Volonté: fighting the good fight 

The PACE resolution deals specifically with living wills and advance directives, documents crafted by healthy patients intended to guide their care when incapacitated. Advocates like Gregor Puppinck, who runs the Strasbourg-based European Center for Law and Justice, point out that living wills and advance directives are often used against patients and allow for “backdoor” mercy killings. The new resolution sets out a series of principles that should govern the practice in the member states of the Council of Europe. One of the principles is that “in case of doubt, the decision must always be pro-life and in favor of the prolongation of life.” 

The bad news is the resolution is not binding on the forty-seven member states. Puppinck believes, however, that it will have an “influence on the legislative process and on the judicial process, especially on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.” He points out the Assembly “recommends that the Committee of Ministers [the national ambassadors in Strasbourg], bring the resolution to the attention of member states, with a request for implementation.” That is not as far-fetched and toothless as it seems. The Nazis made Europeans far more allergic to such things than we are.

Calling the resolution “a major victory for the protection of life and dignity” Puppinck expects that it will have an impact on an impending judgment in a European Court case called Koch v. Germany concerning a ban on assisted suicide.

This is not the first such victory for life advocates in Europe. They seem to be on a kind of roll. Only last January the European Court rendered a decision on assisted suicide. While the court said there is something like a right to commit suicide, the court denied a right to have anyone help you do it. The new PACE resolution seems to suggest that assisted suicide is in fact a violation of the right to life guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights.

Luca Volonté, who led the effort and is chairman of the European People’s Party in PACE said, “We have fought a good battle and we have won, thank God, against a real ideological tyranny of the culture of death.”
 

Austin Ruse is the President of the New York and Washington, D.C.-based Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), a research institute that focuses exclusively on international social policy. The opinions expressed here are Mr. Ruse’s alone and do not necessarily reflect the policies or positions of C-FAM.

© 2012 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (4)Add Comment
0
...
written by Michael PS, January 27, 2012
I think you exaggerate on the issue of SSM. Only six out of the 47 member states of the Council of Europe allow SSM. On 22 November 2011, the European Court of Human Rights, in a plenary session, upheld the right of member states to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples (Schalk and Kopf v. Austria)

Even in a country as secular as France, the two highest courts, the Court of Cassation (13 March 2007)) and the Constitutional Council (28 January 2011) confirmed the judgment of the lower courts in rejecting a right to SSM. They upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal that its “specific and non-discriminatory character was the result of the fact that nature had limited potential fertility to couples of different sexes… Clearly, same-sex couples whom nature had not made potentially fertile were consequently not concerned by the institution of marriage. This was differential legal treatment because their situation was not analogous” The Civil Code contains no definition of marriage, but the courts treated Article 312 - “The child conceived or born during the marriage has the husband for father” – as a functional definition.
0
...
written by Grump, January 27, 2012
We typically think Europe is exponentially further out on the pelvic left. On some issues – like homosexual marriage – they are.
=======================================================
=====
Kinda like praising with faint damns, Austin. Of course, the Europeans have a ways to go to "catch up" to American kitsch culture in so many ways. But give them time and they'll be a Mickey Mouse kingdom in every country and a McDonald's in every village some day.
0
...
written by Howard Kainz, January 27, 2012
Most Western European countries, with the exception of Germany and most of the U.K. restrict abortion to the first trimester, with various exceptions for health-related issues, counseling, and sex crimes. If our policies were determined by elected legislators rather than judicial rulings like Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Dalton, we would probably have similar restrictions.
0
...
written by Paolo, January 28, 2012
I think the essential difference between us, European people, and you is the rejection to mention God in law, so that He has already disappeared into the collective conscience. Only you, Americans, could have still the courage, and I hope the coherent strenght to enforce this link also in the educational critical passage of the natural law.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Other Articles By This Author

CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner