The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
You Can Look It Up Print E-mail
By Joseph R. Wood   
Thursday, 16 February 2012

“Woe,” thought I. Our esteemed founder and editor-in-chief of The Catholic Thing, Bob Royal, had asked me to review a . . . dictionary. Who needs another dictionary on the long shelf of dictionaries? The pressures of the job have robbed him of his wits.

But St. Francis and other saints are rumored to have said that everything is a gift, and so too this assignmentWords of Wisdom: A Philosophical Dictionary for the Perennial Tradition, by Creighton University philosophy professor John W. Carlson, is an extremely useful tool for the student or home philosopher whose schooling and memory need constant refreshing and sharpening. 

And it’s apparently a welcome addition for the professionals as well: Aidan Nichols, author of The Shape of Catholic Theology and other masterpieces, called Carlson’s new reference “an invaluable resource.” Why such praise for a dictionary?

Although we do not think of philosophy, at least in the last few centuries, as a “hard” or empirical science, it is nevertheless a rigorous field where words have meanings that count. When those meanings are obscured or lost, either through intentional distortion or careless usage, the search for truth becomes muddled, and the reason side of “faith and reason” suffers. 

Correcting this muddle has long been understood to be an urgent task by thoughtful scholars working in the classical and Catholic traditions, not least Pope John Paul II, whom Carlson quotes to open the book.

E. F. Schumacher, the author of the 1970s hits Small is Beautiful and A Guide for the Perplexed was much more than some new age guru fascinated by Buddhism and ecology, as he is sometimes falsely remembered. He was also an orthodox Catholic who worried about the demise of metaphysics, and believed the foremost task of his age was a reconstruction of traditional metaphysical truths, a project where a correct understanding of vocabulary would be critical.  

Schumacher wrote:

In ethics, as in so many other fields, we have recklessly and willfully          abandoned our great classical-Christian heritage. We have even degraded the very words without which ethical discourse cannot carry on, words like “virtue,” “love,” and “temperance.” The task of our generation, I have no doubt, is one of metaphysical reconstruction. 

The distinguished philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, in his 1981 classic After Virtue, traced the catastrophic decline of the understanding of essential vocabulary in philosophy after the Enlightenment, rendering much contemporary philosophy and culture meaningless or dangerously wrong: “the language of morality is in [a] state of grave disorder. . . .There seems to be no rational way of securing moral agreement in our culture.” Take a quick look at the headlines: thirty years after MacIntyre’s careful study, things have not improved.

C.S. Lewis, writing in the middle years of the last century, gave us a more humorous take on the same grave problem. In “Screwtape Proposes a Toast,” an addition to The Screwtape Letters, the master tempter advises recent graduates of the Tempters Training College for Young Devils:

Democracy is the word with which you must lead them by the nose. The good work which our philological experts have already done in the corruption of human language makes it unnecessary to warn you that they should never be allowed to give this word a clear and definable meaning. They won’t. It will never occur to them that Democracy is properly the name of a political system, even a system of voting, and that this has only the most remote and tenuous connection with what you are trying to sell them. . . .You are to use the word purely as an incantation; if you like, purely for its selling power.

As we watch the unfolding of the progressive political agenda in the United States (and a similar agenda in Europe), Lewis has proven prescient as always in demonstrating how the power of a word can be misused against its own real meaning. 

As another example, consider how the word “equality” is used to justify an astonishing, and frightening, range of policies in contemporary politics, with much the same result as Lewis discerned in the misuse of “democracy.”

So as a step towards recovering the vocabulary that lets us seek and express truth, enter Carlson and his new dictionary with clear, concise definitions of words like virtue, love, temperance, democracy, and equality: a total of 1173 words or phrases. 

The selection is rooted in Thomism but includes entries on schools and concepts such as utilitarianism, phenomenology, and existentialism. Technical terms like “kenosis” are explained succinctly and thoroughly. Carlson includes abundant references to the work of St. Thomas and other Catholic thinkers that enrich the explanations and definitions. 

The book also offers another great gift, a magnificent bibliography with a section on St. Thomas as well as sections on other topics and authors. Those who want greater depth on particular ideas and terms will have plenty of resources at their disposal. 

In combination with the splendid glossary in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, readers who buy Carlson’s volume will have two bookshelf tools to understand comprehensively, precisely, and authoritatively the rich vocabulary of philosophical and theological pursuits. 

A dictionary alone cannot make us all philosophers. But Carlson has given those who wish to seek truth, to “do philosophy,” a truly excellent means to clear the muddle of much so-called moral and philosophical discussion – babble, really – that we read and hear today. 

This book is a great service to the wisdom and tradition of the thinkers who gave us the words and ideas it describes. As it turns out, we do need another dictionary. This one.

 
Joseph R. Wood is a former White House official who worked on foreign policy, including Vatican affairs.
 
 
The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.    

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (3)Add Comment
0
...
written by Timothy J.A. O'Donnell, February 16, 2012
Having relied on Bernard Wuellner's "Dictionary of Scholastic Philosophy" for many years, it was with much anticipation that I awaited the release of this book. This is quite an excellent resource and gift for those seeking to grow in wisdom. In our ge of muddled thinking, this dictionary is indispensable. I also had the pleasure of meeting the author at Notre Dame last year a conference. I highly recommend this book.
0
...
written by Dave, February 16, 2012
Thanks to you, Mr. Wood, and to you, Dr. O'Donnell, for the article and the comment. I would like to add the gloss that although it is not an empirical, or "hard" science, philosophy is a science nonetheless. I've read in recent months that some of St. Thomas Aquinas' musings on the deep structures of reality have been verified by late twentieth-century particle physics. But of course the truths of philosophy need not be empirically verifiable in order to be true and trustworthy. Thanks for helping us remember, and for your comments on E. F. Schumacher.
0
...
written by John W. (Jack) Carlson, February 17, 2012
Often it is Friday evening by the time I catch up on TCT columns for the week. And so it has been this week. Needless to say, I am surprised and honored and humbled by the present notice.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Other Articles By This Author

CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US