The Catholic Thing
HOME        ARCHIVES        IN THE NEWS        COMMENTARY        NOTABLE        DONATE
Evangelical Catholicism and Being an Ambassador for Christ Print E-mail
By Francis J. Beckwith   
Friday, 01 March 2013

In his new book, Evangelical Catholicism, George Weigel maintains that the Catholic Church is entering a new era in which it must make its case, preach its message, and offer its graces to a civilization in the West that has become increasingly secular and aggressively hostile to the message of Christ and his Church.  This, of course, must be coupled with a vibrant and attractive witness on the part of the faithful, the clergy, and the magisterium.  For when the former is unmoored from the latter – that is, when faith is without hope and charity – the Church’s message begins to sound like “a noisy gong or a clanging symbol.” (1 Cor. 13:1)

Reading Weigel’s prescription, my mind gravitated to the work of my good friend, Gregory P. Koukl, with whom I co-authored the 1998 book Relativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air. A Protestant, Greg is president of Stand to Reason (STR), an Evangelical ministry that has as its core mission to train Christians, ‘to think more clearly about their faith and to make an evenhanded, incisive, yet gracious defense for classical Christianity and classical Christian values in the public square.”

STR equips “Christian ambassadors with knowledge, wisdom, and character,” defining each attribute in the following way. Knowledge is “an accurate grasp of the foundational precepts of the Kingdom.” Wisdom is “skillful, tactical, fair, and diplomatic use of knowledge.” And character is “a mature expression of virtue, warmth, and personal depth.”

Inspired by St. Paul’s affirmation that “we are ambassadors for Christ as though God were entreating through us,” (2 Cor. 5:20) Greg has composed “An Ambassador’s Creed” that includes several planks relevant to Weigel’s call to Evangelical Catholicism:

  • An Ambassador is alert for chances to represent Christ and will not back away from a challenge or an opportunity. . . .
  • An Ambassador won’t quarrel, but will listen in order to understand, then with gentleness seek to respectfully correct those in opposition. . . .
  • An Ambassador has informed convictions (not just feelings), gives reasons, asks questions, aggressively seeks answers, and will not be stumped by the same challenge twice. . . .
  • An Ambassador adapts to each unique person and situation, maneuvering with wisdom to challenge bad thinking, presenting the truth in an understandable and compelling way. . . .
  • An Ambassador is careful with language, and will not rely on Christian lingo nor gain unfair advantage with empty rhetoric. . . .
  • An Ambassador will act with grace, kindness, and good manners and will not dishonor Christ in his conduct. . . .
  • An Ambassador knows that effectiveness requires joining his best efforts with God’s power. . . . 

 Calling the first Apostles by Domenico Ghirlandaio, 1481

In the American context, these planks (or similar ones) are essential to a vibrant Evangelical Catholicism. For we are at a moment in history in which the Church and its message are viewed through media committed to a set of cultural, philosophical, and political categories that are by their nature incapable of communicating Catholicism (or any form of serious Christianity, for that matter).

So, for example, in discussing the Church’s understanding of unborn human life, marriage, economic justice, the death penalty, the nature of salvation, or even the priesthood and the liturgical changes of Vatican II, we are invited to look at these issues through political categories that cannot possibly capture the philosophical anthropology that informs the Church’s views. We are told that the Church is “conservative” on abortion and the priesthood, “liberal” on economic justice and the death penalty, and that Pope Benedict XVI is a “conservative” on the liturgy because he has called for a “reform of the reform.” 

Ironically, to use Weigel’s nomenclature, both the “traditionalist Catholic” and the “progressive Catholic” would agree with this account, and leave it at that. But an Evangelical Catholic would view these depictions as an opportunity to correct, clarify, and explain the Church’s teachings, and in the process suggest, in a spirit of charity and friendship, that “liberal” and “conservative” are not theological categories.

However well or badly these terms may reflect political realities in the United States and other Western nations, they are not appropriate when applied to theological questions that concern the most profound issues about human nature and our ultimate end.

So, to provide another example, instead of merely complaining that the HHS mandate impedes the religious liberty of Catholic citizens (which it in fact does), the Evangelical Catholic explains why the Church’s positions on contraception, conjugal love, and unborn human life are rationally defensible. He also lives consistently with these teachings, and thus becomes a living witness of their truth. He does not allow the secularist to categorize the Church’s moral theology as the intellectual equivalent of a personal hobby that has no philosophical or practical heft.

The Evangelical Catholic does not celebrate or lament these opportunities. He engages them, for he sees himself as an ambassador of the Church, taking “every thought captive to obey Christ.” (2 Cor. 10:5). The Evangelical Catholic is always “ready to make [a] defense to anyone who demands from [him] an accounting for the hope that is in [him]; yet [he does] it with gentleness and reverence.” (1 Peter 3:14-16).

 
Francis J. Beckwith is Professor of Philosophy and Church-State Studies at Baylor University, where he is also a Resident Fellow in the Institute for Studies of Religion. He is the author of Return to Rome: Confessions of an Evangelical Catholic and one of four primary contributors to Journeys of Faith: Evangelicalism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Catholicism, and Anglicanism.
 
 
The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (6)Add Comment
0
...
written by Dennis, March 01, 2013
I cannot understand why evangelical Christians pursue such works as described above. If we are all saved by Faith alone, I cannot understand why they value works. I've asked several of them over the years and never received a clear answer. We need to do all of the above, of course. But why?
0
...
written by Chris in Maryland, March 01, 2013
Among other things, the crisis depends upon the person or persons for which we are making our appeal. In man's fallen state of nature, we pursue personal satisfaction, "what's best for me," and form coalitions of groups who pursue "what's best for our group."

Jesus Christ teaches us that the truth is only found in denying oneself, and appealing for "what's best for the other." In other words, this is the opposite of "me" and "groups," which are closed. It is a personal posture of openess.

Appealing for the good of the other is to imitate Christ, who is, in the words of Benedict XVI, the only totally open being.
0
...
written by Paul Rodden, March 01, 2013
Shame Greg doesn't revert, too.

I have the book, and I watched his excellent talk to students on Relativism up on Veritas Forum (Where I first came across him), 'putting a stone in their shoe'.
The materials and talks up on STR are first class.


However, what I don't understand is that STR applies Relativism so adeptly to everything that moves, apart from the error 'Protestant Relativism', but maybe that explains the fact that no-one likes their Relativism being exposed as being such? Everyone's a Relativist, except me.
0
...
written by athanasius, March 01, 2013
"The Evangelical Catholic is always 'ready to make defense to anyone...'"

Spot on! In order to defend and spread the faith, we need to know what it is! I know many sports fan who defend their teams with evangelical fervor, quoting stats freely. Other examples abound as well. We need to be as knowledgeable about our faith.
0
...
written by Chris In Maryland, March 01, 2013
If evangelicalism requires knowledge of our Faith, and skill at reasoning and diplomacy, I wonder what Catholic thought leaders are thinking about/doing to confront the problem with the laity and clergy - that we are like most other people - impoverished of knowledge of our Faith, and unskilled at reasoning and diplomacy...in short...at our own level of mission work - we are ill-equipped, very unlike our former Pope.
0
...
written by Dan , March 02, 2013
Too often the world (partly promoted by distortions in the media) only hears the word "NO" coming from the Church, when in fact, there is a rich understanding within the church of the WHOLE person (complete with sexuality, addictions, desire for meaningful relationships, need for food, water, shelter, etc. I think, for example, of "Theology of The Body") The world needs to hear this "YES" coming from the church -- to be about the business of bringing people to Christ himself to experience his transforming power in all its richness.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
CONTACT US FOR ADVERTISERS ABOUT US
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner