The Catholic Thing
Medicine As If Catholicism Mattered Print E-mail
By Robert Royal   
Thursday, 31 October 2013

I spent a couple of pleasant days last week at the annual conference of the Catholic Medical Association, which met this year in Santa Barbara, California. Not a bad venue – Catholic medical professionals aren’t dumb. But the real pleasure was to be part of a group of 500 people that included doctors, nurses, pharmacists, chiropractors, medical ethicists, and others passionately committed not only to the healing arts, but to the Catholic faith.

Yes, you read right, 500 of them, and that’s only those who were able to attend. If you get your impression of Catholic healthcare professionals today solely from secular sources, you would assume that they’re all caving or about to cave on the HHS mandates, playing duplicitous games on the life issues at their institutions, and in essence not really different from their mainstream counterparts.

You’d be wrong – as I myself was before last week. There’s actually a significant segment of the Catholic medical community that is both principled and making efforts to be even clearer about what being a Catholic requires of them today.

You won’t be surprised to hear that they drew on some of our writers at The Catholic Thing and a wider circle of our friends as speakers: Matt Hanley of the National Catholic Bioethics Center, Christopher Kaczor of Loyola Marymount University, and Andreas Widmer of the Catholic University of America, among several others.

Matt Hanley gave a pair of beautiful lectures that combined, as he has several times for TCT, careful moral reflection with empirical evidence about public health. For example, did you know that there’s no study showing that Risk Reduction programs – e.g., condoms provided to stop the spread of AIDS in Africa – have any measurable effect on such epidemics, except perhaps to encourage people to engage in risky behavior in the false belief that they’re protected?

By contrast, in several African nations where it was not assumed that people were too immature to be taught Risk Avoidance – i.e., fidelity and chastity – instead of seeking technological solutions via Risk Reduction for human problems, there have been sharp reductions in the incidence of AIDS and its spread.

By the way, Pope Benedict made this very point a few years ago, which is well supported by careful empirical research, to general mockery and scorn. Our culture doesn’t need science to tell it what it already “knows.”   

Hanley’s general case for treating people as morally responsible agents, even if they’re poor in Africa, was reinforced by Andreas Widmer, a former Swiss Guard, who’s written for us here, and also wrote a book on what he learned about leadership from Pope John Paul II. In recent years, he’s tried to bring together Catholic notions about the human person with the need for development in places like Africa.

Africa is an instructive case. It has only 12 percent of the world’s population and receives one-third of global philanthropic donations. Yet it remains relatively underdeveloped. Why? Widmer compared it, at least initially, to a counseling situation. When there’s a crisis, you handle it, but then help move the person into a more self-reliant mode. Otherwise, you create a kind of co-dependence.

That may be okay with those who don’t have a high view of all human persons as free and responsible and made in the image of God. Or of well meaning but misguided celebrities like Bill and Melinda Gates or the Irish rocker Bono (a Catholic), says Widmer. But the humanity of both giver and receiver have to be a carefully co-ordinated so that the full human personhood of all is always in play. Philanthropy has a definite role in troubled regions, but it’s ultimate goal should be to eliminate its own reason for being by enabling people to become fully mature, self-governing adults in their own right.

I haven’t mentioned – because I want to get all this in first – that one of the themes of this year’s conference was medicine and social justice. But the organizers did not take the usual clichéd approaches. They put all that, as you might deduce from the account above, under a strong sense of authentic Catholic social thought. Bishop Robert Vasa of Santa Rosa, a strong and growing presence in the United States, celebrated Mass each morning and was honest enough to say he was more puzzled after hearing the well-crafted lectures on medicine and justice than before.

And that’s all to the good because, contrary to common assumptions, these are not simple questions, as Obamacare is starting to instruct the whole world. But the CMA went even further, warning of decidedly unjust threats just down the road.

I’ve generally thought it a bit extreme to describe us as heading towards “death panels” and other large horrors in the current reforms of medicine. After hearing from an impassioned speaker about POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment), I’m not so sure. I am sure that we need to be extremely vigilant about all such programs. POLST is billed as a more effective way for people nearing the end to express their exact wishes about choices of treatments. But good Catholic doctors have seen – and worry about – how in fact this system is being used to limit treatment of the elderly without a doctor ever having spoken to a patient about his or her wishes. And they’re being warned about subtle ways these deceptive programs are being insinuated into private medical practices.

Over and beyond the riches of speakers, spiritual opportunities, instruction, however, what most impressed me was the overall spirit of this assembly – not merely concerned about educating members (though obviously engaged in that). But this is a group that knows itself to be operating in a culture that is now at odds with the great tradition of medicine from the days of the original Hippocratic Oath down to our day.

They have many hard battles ahead. But what a comfort to know that some of our medical professionals, our good Catholic men and women in healthcare fields, have both the brains and the heart to do something, often against strong pressure and narrowing odds. 

Robert Royal is editor-in-chief of The Catholic Thing, and president of the Faith & Reason Institute in Washington, D.C. His most recent book is The God That Did Not Fail: How Religion Built and Sustains the Westnow available in paperback from Encounter Books.
The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.


Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (5)Add Comment
written by Deacon Ed Peitler, October 31, 2013
There was a period - about six years ago - when i would attend the annual CMA meetings. At that time, I was employed by a large, non-sectarian medical center in the South and was sitting on their Institutional Review Board which reviewed new medicine and device research protocols. Being a Catholic deacon, I wanted to make certain that votes I was casting were consonant with Catholic teaching (although such a consideration would have been alien to any others on the Board).

Somehow I found the CMA and viewed it as a resource to better inform me about Church teachings on matters of bioethics. After my very first meeting in Philadelphia, I thought I had died and gone to heaven. I remember telephoning my wife and telling her, "You won't believe these people here. They are consummate medical professionals and are actually faithful, practicing Catholics." For awhile,? these meetings were an annual pilgrimage for me, and then later, me wife-nurse.

Medical people who frequent this site ought to look into the CMA.
written by Thomas A. Szyszkiewicz, October 31, 2013
The CMA held out against the tide of secularism that overtook the Catholic Health Association and other similar "Catholic" groups. They stood firmly on the truth of the Faith even through the tumult following Humanae Vitae. Thanks be to God for them, but we need to hold them up in prayer that they will remain faithful in the upcoming difficulties we face. Their fidelity may be a comfort for us, but they certainly aren't comfortable.
written by Steve Golay, October 31, 2013
A high view of BOTH the giver and receiver, I like that.

After reading this piece I glanced at the address Cardinal Maradiaga gave at the University of Dallas (Whispers in the Loggia has a posting).

Of course, in a supposedly major speech (he being one of the chosen "Eight") one is tempted to disappointed in the "Catholic things" not addressed. So be it. One expects from t5his cardinal that he would focus on the PTP (preferential treatment of the poor). This topic has been overburdened with essays, books, conferences, let alone major addresses, since whichever bishops conference one wishes to choose.

Wish the Cardinal did just that, brisk up the tired rhetoric with spice about the moral responsibility of the poor themselves. This would be truly revolutionary - in Latin America as well as Africa.

This emphasizes upon the moral responsibility of the receiver parallels the responsibility of those in a different kind of "poverty" - (as we used to say) those trapped in the poverty of sin. Unless . . . never mind, don't think the Cardinal would actually go there.

In his address there were a few instances when I feared he was going to send us down the path of the social demonology of the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers and the late - yet hopefully not hauling in the rapaciousness of the Zionists.

The Cardinal is spot on with his thoughts on the great fall of Europe. Yet in uprighting that place one will need to do battle against totalitarian Islam as well as the tyranny of the "dictatorship of relativism". Taking a hundred year view of things, that is the greater challenge than the gaming of Monopoly players: those squishing little fellows with the black top hats can be easily shamed, as the Cardinal well knows. That is why trillions pour into and out of Washington according to the dictates of the power ideologues. They are a safe target for the Cardinal's grievance.
written by Ike Wilson, October 31, 2013
Sad to say but actuarially and economically it is vital for Obamacare to have Death Panels. They will have a comforting name however and people will be praised for their responsibility in succumbing to them so most people will think they're swell.
written by Steve Golay, October 31, 2013
I was processing through sessions to enter the Church when the priest sex abuse crisis reared its head. Found it difficult to process that along with that. (For reasons.) Almost walked away. Was unable to get answers to pacify my questions from the session leaders, or even the parish priest. (This was near Santa Cruz, CA.) Then I providentially stumbled across a report issued by the CMA addressing, not only about the crisis, but the very condition (resist the term "nature") of homosexuality. It was faithful but above all frank. I stayed put in the sessions, and was happy for it.

Charity without Reason (or "Wisdom", as a Jewish French philosopher recently put it regarding the Pope's off-the-cuff remarks) is no affection to the homosexual person.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters