The Catholic Thing
On the Alternative to Humanity Print E-mail
By James V. Schall, S.J.   
Monday, 08 July 2013

Josef Pieper’s 1954 book, The End of Time, begins with two citations. The second selection is from the German poet, Konrad Weiss. It reads: “The will, which is today growing ever greater, to create a condition that shall hold within it an exemplarily complete essence of humanity and an enduring peace, is burdened by the heavy paradox that it is not humanity which is the goal of the Incarnation.”

Weis speaks of a “will” that grows stronger. This “will” wants to gain control of all of humanity. Once it accomplishes this incorporation, we will have “peace.” Man and only man will be in charge of man. But exactly whose “will” seeks these things? Evidently, for Weiss, it is not the “will” that was responsible for the Incarnation. In other words – shades of Augustine – we have two conflicting wills at work among us.  Each seeks to clarify and complete what man is.

The Incarnation means that God becomes not “humanity,” but this man, Christ, born of a woman, in a definite time and place. “Humanity” is an abstraction from an abstraction – Socrates-man-humanity. Humanity is not “born”; it is a mental form, valid for what it is. Humanity includes all men in one concept without necessarily identifying any individual person. Marx called it “the species-man.” Weiss was correct in thinking that these two understandings are opposed to each other.

The understanding of man that flows from the Incarnation knows that what it is to be man is a given. “Politics does not make man to be man,” Aristotle rightly said, “but taking him from nature as already man, makes him to be good man.” Some minds refuse to understand man as “already man” without their input. This “no given nature” becomes the modern presupposition of liberty – nothing there but what I will. In other words, what it is to be man is not taken as a given. Indeed, the idea, that what it is to be man is a given, is conceived to be a threat against “humanity.” Why is this?

I write in the light of recent Supreme Court decisions which, at bottom, are motivated by this “will” to make man, by positive law, something other than he is by nature. The “mind” of the justices may, at first sight, seem to be their own. But they further a “will” that they do not acknowledge. This will is connected to an intelligence that “knows” what it does, an intelligence that hates man as given. The modern mind is in position to do this refashioning of man both because of modern thought and modern technology.

       The Angel Michael Binding Satan by William Blake (c. 1805)

Weiss’s wording was perceptive. This modern “will” demands “the complete essence of humanity.” That is, it does not allow any possibility for an understanding of what man is other than its own willed formulation of it. It wants to remove not only the idea that a proper and superior understanding of what man is exists, but it seeks to forbid any speaking of this alternative.

The “hate speech” that we see increasingly applied with regard to the content of revelation is no accident. The “complete essence of humanity” allows no alternative to its own agenda. It insists on producing a mankind closed to any signs of Incarnation that might lead us to a proper understanding of man.

In his new book, On the God of Christians (and on one or two others), the French philosopher Rémi Brague writes: “What is personal in us sins by rejecting living out of personal liberty and by seeking to possess what in us is natural.” It strikes me that this “to seek to possess in us what is natural” is Weiss’ concern about the will to define and thus to control the “essence of humanity.” Our political classes see themselves as free to recreate man over against what he is because no understanding of man is admitted except as a vague concept whose content needs to be filled in by man, not discovered from nature as already given.

This “will” that “grows” to create a better humanity than the one given in nature and confirmed by the Incarnation must logically seek, step by step, to affirm as “good” each act and way of life that was seen to be bad in nature. Thus, the content of the new humanity does not really come from man but from its opposition to whoever it was that formulated what it is to be man in the first place.

The “heavy paradox” of the Incarnation is indeed a “burden” that the new humanity bears since it can never really deal with ordinary human beings and their transcendent destiny but only, beginning with love and the family, recast them in forms that are directly opposed to that incarnate being in which along man’s ultimate good can be found.  

James V. Schall, S.J., who served as a professor at Georgetown University for thirty-five years, is one of the most prolific Catholic writers in America. His most recent books are The Mind That Is Catholic and The Modern Age.
The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (7)Add Comment
written by Bill Beckman, July 08, 2013
Thank you, Fr. Schall. This is right on target. The Windsor decision is simply the latest in the movement to reject the truth inherent in human nature -- a truth given by the Creator. We've arrived at a very peculiar jurisprudence. Positivist justices interpret the Constitution as somehow requiring the "deconstituting" of who we are by nature. It is the trajectory of the "mystery" paragraph of Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
written by Xabi Kiano, July 08, 2013
Excellent essay, Schall!
written by Tony, July 08, 2013
Thank you and God bless you, Father Schall, for saying so clearly what I've been struggling to say. I've recently written that modern man is on the point of denying both that he has a soul and that he has a body -- the complete madness of turning against everything that makes him what he is.
written by Layman Tom, July 08, 2013
Good is Bad. Up is down. Freedom is slavery.

Doublespeak is an insidious thing. Apparently, we are at the juncture that, having coddled our minds with misappropriated words and phrases; he, behind the will, is fruitfully going about the business of reordering humanity's mind. And when those of us who will not succumb to the new humanity's tenets stand up and protest, he will not even need to soil his hooves dispensing with us. The body politic, acting on mob mentality will be his faithful servants and do the dirty work for him. How long will this take? Is it already too late to forestall this?

That may be a myopic take on this. I know that all of humanity does not live under the jurisdiction of the USSC. I know that He and his divine plan are not dependent on the USA. Yet, I am, after all, an American and tend to view the world through that lens. I know that all over the World bad things have happened and evil has flourished. Yet I’ve always believed that we were the “Last, greatest hope”. Always believed America was a “shining city on the hill”. Not because we were more prosperous, or experienced mostly peaceful times, but because we were founded on Christian principles and our populous believed in and was regulated by those principles. Where we have come to and from whence in a very short period of time is unbelievable and would have been thought absurd even a decade ago. It is hard for me not to feel that the world hangs on the cliff with America’s fortune. If we are successfully “reordered” as a strictly secular humanist country, there will be no place that will be safe for Christians to turn.

written by Jack,CT, July 08, 2013
Thanks for a great read Father...
written by Deacon Ed Peitler, July 09, 2013
I am convinced that until we name the cause for all the trouble the world is in, we will be tilting at windmills. His name is Legion. He will continue to attack all that is incarnate of the Holy Spirit, just as he always has.
written by stanley, July 11, 2013
I noticed Obama's comments in Northern Ireland on the "divisiveness" of Catholic/Protestant schools. As Fr. Schall mentions here... the goal is to "allow no alternative" to the state's vision of things.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


Other Articles By This Author