The Catholic Thing
Unrepentant Love Print E-mail
By Matthew Hanley   
Sunday, 17 March 2013

Last Sunday, we reached that time in Lent – Laetare Sunday – explicitly exempted from the penitential practices in order to rejoice, to celebrate.  A day to briefly press the pause button on Lenten austerities. And who doesn’t welcome that. Who doesn’t prefer rejoicing to repenting? Now, here we are back with a few weeks of special penances again. What does this swing mean?

Sure, we may know intellectually – from experience or intuition– how vital repentance is to the life of our souls.  Yet so many other road maps to the good life vie for out attention.  Education, for example, is often viewed as a far more important category in life; without it, we are led to believe, a decent life is next to impossible. 

Highly educated by some standards we may be these days, and yet: what of our souls?

Even knowing the preeminent value of repentance, however, there is always that pull towards letting it slide by asserting ourselves in destructive ways or, more benignly, by seizing the good things within our reach. And how many good things there are!        

Well, as long as we are meditating upon repentance – in the context of a larger imitation of Christ – we might well contemplate the dramatic manner in which Jesus was unrepentant. We may ordinarily equate the unrepentant with the defiant, the rebel, or the amiable rogue. It’s a good look – a cool way to roll. But the self-emptying, obedient Jesus: unrepentant?

At least that is how Joseph Ratzinger depicted the relentless nature of His love. In an arresting passage of his 1968 book Introduction to Christianity, he writes:

There is a tranquility that knows: in the last analysis, I cannot destroy what he has built up. For in himself man lives with the dreadful knowledge that his power to destroy is infinitely greater than his power to build up. But this same man knows that in Christ the power to build up has proved infinitely stronger. This is the source of a profound freedom, a knowledge of God’s unrepentant love; he sees through all our errors and remains well disposed to us.
This knowledge – this science – of God’s “unrepentant love” is not just deeply consoling but the source of great freedom.  Incidentally, Frederica Mathewes-Green makes that same connection, while also discussing repentance, in her book The Jesus Prayer – an engaging account of her experience with that particular Eastern Orthodox practice:
He knows far worse about us than we could stand to know about ourselves. Yet he loves us completely, loves us more than anyone in the world could ever love us. This combination, of being utterly known, yet unconditionally loved, is the only true liberation.

The truth about this love is that it has its own inherent properties, as do other sciences. It is as incompatible with license as it is with that other extreme: a formulaic or uptight legalism. It cannot undergo a convenient metamorphosis and become roughly synonymous with other widespread, undemanding connotations of the word. The basic form of love, Ratzinger maintains, remains justice; love exceeds but never destroys justice: “A love that overthrew justice would create injustice and thus cease to be anything but a caricature of love.”

In fact, Ratzinger’s inviting expression comes, of all places, under his treatment of this particular line of the creed: "He will come again to judge the living and the dead." He goes on, after cautioning against harboring any “false Christian self-confidence” to write: “At the same time the Christian knows, however, that he is not free to do whatever he pleases.” Even such powerful grace – God’s unrepentant love – does not wipe out our freedom. We must decide how to respond.  It is in this precise respect, he writes, that the equality of all men is truly confirmed.

To pretend that whatever we choose to do is fine because it is we who choose it is not only to normalize narcissism but is to excise the ultimate drama from human existence. He concludes with this: “Nothing and no one empowers us to trivialize the tremendous seriousness involved in such knowledge; it shows our life to be a serious business and precisely by doing so gives it its dignity.”

In this brief passage, Ratzinger crystallizes the foundational concepts of freedom, equality, and dignity by tracing them back to their relationship to God’s unrepentant love. And in so doing – by simply presenting the gold standard – he exposes the modern day understanding of those concepts for what they have become: a trinity of old Christian concepts gone mad, to paraphrase Chesterton.

The mad versions of these concepts – freedom as license, equality as cudgel against nature, dignity as autonomy – are what typically constitute the “quality of life” considerations upon which many people in the secular West, if only by default, filter momentous personal, cultural, and ethical issues.

Yet the superficiality, bleakness, and lack of purpose that has proliferated alongside material comfort – have yet to propel a critical mass from questioning the credibility of those words as commonly understood.

So, will Christianity at this historical moment, unlike, say, 1968 or 1989 (as discussed by Ratzinger in his updated preface) “make itself heard as an epoch-making alternative”? Now that we have a new pope, that remains to be seen.

I suspect many of us are simply too comfortable, that our pain has not yet exceeded our profligacy. But as we grapple with the great distance that divides us over what matters most – with the depth of error that has engulfed us, we can hope that many are prompted to turn back with us, recalling that the Father, who alone can restore all that has been lost, loved the Prodigal Son while he was still far off.

Isn’t that really the ultimate goal of all our repentance? That through self-denial and fidelity to justice, we may by His aid one day become like the Master: unrepentant in love.

Matthew Hanley is, with Jokin de Irala, M.D., the author of Affirming Love, Avoiding AIDS: What Africa Can Teach the West, which recently won a best-book award from the Catholic Press Association. His latest report, The Catholic Church & The Global AIDS Crisis is now available from the Catholic Truth Society, publisher to the Holy See in the U.K.

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Rules for Commenting

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments, which should reflect a sense of brevity and a spirit of Christian civility, and which, as discretion indicates, we reserve the right to publish or not. And, please, do not include links to other websites; we simply haven't time to check them all.

Comments (3)Add Comment
written by Manfred, March 17, 2013
Please forgive me, Mr. Hanley, but I truly believe that articles of this type have really lost their relevancy.You write of the thoughts of Joseph Ratzinger. Lay people such as myself are really tired of theory-our lives are of necessity practical. Example: Recent news cited a brief meeting of Pope Francis and Cdl. Law at Santa Maria Maggiore. It was rumored that Francis had ordered Law to no longer live in that basilica's complex. THE HISTORY:Cdl Law left the A'diocese of Boston in disgrace due to his mismanagement of the priest abuse scandals,including writing to then Cdl O'Connor of N.Y. recommending a priest named Paul Shanley for a position in the N.Y. A'dioc. O'Connor however was warned and Shanley was tried in Boston and is now in prison. After a stay with an order of nuns in Maryland(?), Law was offered the position of Archpriest of Santa Maria Maggiore by JP II in 2004 with a sinecure of over 300,000 Euros per year!Ratzinger was elected Pope in 2005. Did he remove Law? Of course not. Law retired from that position in Nov., 2011 but he still lives in the facility and enjoys all its perquisites. What do you think would be the disposition of a Catholic layman who had committed those crimes? He would be in jail. Please stop wasting our time. Thank you.
written by Mack Hall, HSG, March 17, 2013
Well said. Thank you.
written by Graham Combs, March 17, 2013
"a Christian is not free to do whatever he pleases..." How is that ever irrelevant? How often in the past century has ending poverty and starvation and injustice been a justification of for doing whatever man pleases? Heaven knows there are bishops and priests in my archdiocese of whom I have asked: what did he know and when did he know it? Perhaps Cdl Law should return to America and live on his pension like any other retired priest. But I look at Latin America, Asia, Africa, and now America and see too many instances of man doing what he pleases in order to end what only results in increasing: injustice, starvation, and poverty. Sometimes I wonder if those who love the poor, hate poverty just as passionately. Or are the poor being objectified in some sort of secular mantra? As this Great Recession grings on and grinds down the working class and working poor, I await one word of concern or outrage from the American Church.........or even from my parish.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters