<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Laughter of the Lord</title>
		<description>Comments for The Laughter of the Lord at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:23:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Dr</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-laughter-of-the-lord.html#comment-653</link>
			<description>I see that Prof Djerassi says he was misrepresented in his views - see his response in the Guardian at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/27/medical-research-health-response 
Pity that - but no doubt TCT would like to avoid spreading a story that turns out to be incorrect.  Wouldn't want to be held in derision! - David van Gend</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:58:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-laughter-of-the-lord.html#comment-652</link>
			<description>Whenever the Church becomes too sure of itself some great crisis comes along, like Mohammed, like Martin Luther, like Karl Marx, like postmodernism. Is it too self-regarding to think these trials are sent specifically to make us rethink what we thought we knew? - Raymond Barry</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:06:09 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
