<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Part and the Whole</title>
		<description>Comments for The Part and the Whole at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 15 out of 15 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:38:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Dennis Larkin</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2594</link>
			<description>With the returning health of the Catholic bishops, we can still expect good things from the Church in America.  There are still too many compliant bishops who sincerely want to get along with everyone.  But the newer bishops seem to have a spine, and Faith.  With more of them, they'll find the way forward.  But the question I ask of a friend from time to time is, &quot;will there be anything left upon which to build when this generation of bad bishops has gone?&quot;  I trust so. - Dennis Larkin</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:50:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>79858</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2565</link>
			<description>Well done.  One problem that prevents our bishops from forming a meta-society is the existence of huge diocesan bureaucracies which they must adminisiter.  In this sense they mirror the late empire or the Obama admin.  In these bureaucracies, there is much federal money and much left-liberal advocacy. Do the research.  The USCCB is, of course, in the same modality.  Much of the Catholic bureaucracy is essentially a proxy for the state - the bishops are tied to it.  W</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:53:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>&quot;To Miriam&quot;</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2553</link>
			<description>Did Bp. Bruskewitz have good reasons not to sign the charter? Do you know what those reasons are?
All but a very small handful of American bishops have signed onto the USCCB's project to suppress holydays of obligation in this country. Is that small handful not to be &quot;entrusted with our family' instruction in the faith&quot;? - Richard</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:02:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Well Said!</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2551</link>
			<description>We need this type of leadership from the bishops INTENSELY. This is being provided here and there by stalwart Archbishops, but there seems to be no effort to set a &quot;national&quot; position in place, nor to instruct the faithful on the elements of the Faith that are under attack. Right on! - James Stagg</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:26:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>white elephant</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2550</link>
			<description>Even a bad Catholic is likely to recognize Obama's invaluable worth as a person, but to tolerate the insanity and corruption of the principles he propigates is suicide. Thanks for the wonderful article! - Achilles</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:26:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>To Donna</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2549</link>
			<description>As the mother of two young children, I would not entrust our family's instruction in the faith to Bishop Bruskewitz, who was the only US bishop who refused to sign the USCCB's Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People. - Miriam</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:25:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>To Donna</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2548</link>
			<description>Good idea! I wish I were a venture capitalist, in which case I'd fund your program in a heartbeat. -Brad - Brad Miner</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:09:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A necessary stopgap</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2547</link>
			<description>I have a plan. Enlist solid Catholic theologians and catechists. Together with bishops like Chaput, Dolan, and Bruskewitiz, create a two-year teaching program which incorporates evangelization and catechetics. Break it into 72 20-min. homilies, employing the most dynamic homilists in the nation. Film each homily and distribute them to every diocese in N. America.  At homily time, parishes will show segments for three weeks  each month. This is an unusual, but very necessary, stopgap measure. - Donna Procher</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:03:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>straight to the heart</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2546</link>
			<description>This is the very heart of the solution. When we learn what marriage means, the beauty of human sexuality, the love of God who shares everything with us, our final destination; when we are properly catechised, and our hearts burn with love and gratitude for the gift of life, we are a people truly alive and our joy is infectious. It is then that we speak up for all that is lovely and true. Thank you so much for this piece. Blessings - Rene - Mrs. Rene O'Riordan</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:46:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2545</link>
			<description>The US church has irrevocably changed.  Catholics remain a minority, but the immigrant, pre-Vatican II Church of 50 years ago is now successfully integrated into politics/society (look at the Supreme Court!).  In this context, US bishops would do well to contemplate the example of our Holy Father: he met with Obama publicly, accorded him a measure of respect (both as President and as a human being), and at the same time advocated forcefully for the Truth.  Suaviter et fortiter. - Bradley</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:12:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kata Holos</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2540</link>
			<description>Thank you, Father Bramwell.  You have reminded us of the literal meaning of &quot;Catholic,&quot; which is &quot;according to the whole&quot; from the Greek &quot;kata holos.&quot;  The bishops should ask all those in leadership positions of all Catholic institutions how they are communicating that the fullness of the means of salvation objectively subsists in the Catholic Church alone.  Each bishop should regularly incorporate the same message in his own homilies and communications, especially at Confirmations. - Martin Dybicz</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:27:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2541</link>
			<description>Thank you for a wonderful article  to the point.  The Church must look inward as to the way it is teaching the TRUTH and  then steadfastly teach ordinary people like me sitting in the pew.   

The homilies we hear are so weak.  No wonder young people  leave the Church.  We must start with Ten Commandments.  Does anybody ever think of them in their every day life?  Our Church must be strong in the face of socialism prevading all phases of our life from a Godless administration. - Virginia</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:35:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Retired</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2539</link>
			<description>This essay makes two points that deserve further elucidation. First is the fact that many of us today, both inside and outside Catholicism, perceive the Church as just one more  political organization which happens to be in many respects regressive.  Second is the insight that President Obama and his leadership team are attempting nothing less than a cultural transformation of the country. This, of course, is a dangerous thing to do, the costs of which are unpredictable. - John McCarthy</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:49:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vincit Veritas</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2538</link>
			<description>A great article presented with compelling clarity. I agree we need a Church that can be a meta-society as it was in the past, whereby discussion of Christian truths was part of daily discussion. Perhaps the episcopacy is partly responsible for the present quandary by its long standing reticence on matters of faith, but those days of a meta -society have been swallowed up in relativism and denial of Absolutes, thus allowing for others to give us a &quot;change you can believe in.&quot; We are also to blame. - Willie</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:49:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How?</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/the-part-and-the-whole.html#comment-2537</link>
			<description>How will this occur when modernism and liberalism are supported by the media? Catholic Churches no longer instruct their people about what the Church teaches. We have become sheeple in the hands of an authoritarian elite based on pure secularism. Where are the Augustine's or the other brave Bishops who face crumbling empires and rising dictators? - Fr Tim</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:48:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
