<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Teachers as Witnesses</title>
		<description>Comments for Teachers as Witnesses at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:45:39 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Related Book</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/teachers-as-witnesses.html#comment-3618</link>
			<description>You may well enjoy George Steiner's book, Lessons of the Masters.  Steiner would agree, as do I...most heartily. - Magister Christianus</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:06:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>great pair</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/teachers-as-witnesses.html#comment-3606</link>
			<description>Perfect pairing w/ Fr. Schall's previous column.  First the realm of philosophy, then academia, and hopefully further discussion of the witness of humane values (and virtue) in praxis - martyrology perhaps?

One regrets that the article never quite arrives at its implied query - what form does the positive witness of the teacher take?  The author goes to lengths to describe the &quot;activism&quot; of Rorty as a committed ideologue, but never describes him as living a life that would stand as a witness. - Adam</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:56:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>editorial note</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/teachers-as-witnesses.html#comment-3605</link>
			<description>Ok, I hate to introduce pedantics into this otherwise fine essay, but this is the second column in the last couple weeks in which &quot;reticent&quot; is used when &quot;reluctant&quot; is meant. Could we be just a trifle more careful to use the right word? God was. - Richard A</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:30:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>It's Greek to me</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/teachers-as-witnesses.html#comment-3604</link>
			<description>Socrates seems to be in vogue this week, having been held up in the most recent previous column as a paragon of truth. I seem to recall that he repeatedly said he &quot;knows nothing,&quot; and since he left so many questions in the air as to what the chief good in life is, his disciples were left to argue and determine this for themselves, often taking divergent paths. Augustine praised Plato as the greatest of philosophers. Aristotle said truth was greater than his teacher. So who do we listen to? Jesus - Joseph</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:20:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PoMo</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2009/teachers-as-witnesses.html#comment-3603</link>
			<description>Great! When an orthodox mind harvests the worthwhile in the likes of Rorty. Part of the new evangelization Paul VI et aliis spoke about. One thing: Rorty's probably a bit too Socratic and postmodern to accept the label and notion of a &quot;teacher.&quot; And St Augustine's own theories of education were a bit interioristic. 

To emerge from modernity's morass, the new evangelization needs ressourcement, which itself needs not only pagan ancients and Christian Fathers but also the scholastic doctors. - Panda Bear</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:07:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
