<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Relativist's World</title>
		<description>Comments for The Relativist's World at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:23:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/the-relativists-world.html#comment-4511</link>
			<description>This is one of those wonderful occasions in which the spirit of the age is so thoroughly exposed that even its adherents seem to be struck dumb. Certainly there must be some champion of relativism who can come forth to fight this giant, Schall! Wherein has he erred? Oops -- I mean: What is it that you don't happen to find agreeable about what he says?  - Billy Bean</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:22:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>iView</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/the-relativists-world.html#comment-4509</link>
			<description>Yes. It's not so much a worldview as an iView. &quot;I&quot; am the world. What a profound loss of perspective! It is silly on the face of it just like any offer of something for nothing (and indeed from nothing). And yet it seems to be a lesson many of us never learn. It's astounding really. - Joe</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:19:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/the-relativists-world.html#comment-4508</link>
			<description>Another great article by Schall.  Though I would have thought the shortest sentence would have been &quot;Sartre was right&quot; rather than &quot;Nietzsche was right&quot;. - Brian Vozzella</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:47:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Selective Relativism</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/the-relativists-world.html#comment-4507</link>
			<description>Many &quot;relativists&quot; are not relative about everything.  By selecting certain politically correct notions that are not relative, they do achieve a sense of solidarity, of working toward a common good.  Environmentalism - excluding the well-being of unborn children - is one of the non-relative goods; another is defense of any and all sexual behaviors.      - Ars Artium</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:44:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
