<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Not Trusting Grace</title>
		<description>Comments for Not Trusting Grace at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:06:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/not-trusting-grace.html#comment-4704</link>
			<description>Just a nit on another and otherwise wonderful essay by Fr. Bramwell.  It was Judge  -- not Justice -- Bork who was nominated to the Supreme Court (and denied a seat thereon):  Justice Bork is what Judge Bork didn't become.  The nit is worth making, I think, because, interestingly, the Constitution itself speaks (in Art. III, sec. 1 and Art. II, sec. 2, cl. 2) of &quot;Judges,&quot; even specifically of &quot;Judges of the supreme Court.&quot;  It's the judges of the Supreme Court who made themselves into justices.    - Patrick Brennan</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:27:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/not-trusting-grace.html#comment-4702</link>
			<description>Re: Living the Gospel of Christ... 
I've found that &quot;learning&quot; in all matters human, consists of much review, pondering and deliberating with careful discernment...all things experiential--mentally, physically and spiritually.  I feel our &quot;fast-form&quot; ways with fashion and &quot;entitlements&quot; and political popularity, pleasures and daring aplomb...might be overwhelming to the profound depth of Gospel meanings and truths. 

Am I correct in thinking that, after information concerning the &quot;Father&quot; and the &quot;Kingdom of Heaven,&quot; the most talked about message of Jesus was &quot;hypocrisy?&quot; This seems especially problematic with celebrities and politicians today (as well as with plebeian folks such a me).   - Robert Ormsbee</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:57:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/not-trusting-grace.html#comment-4701</link>
			<description>Fr. Bramwell,
Great article.
I mean this in the most complimentary sense: I can't believe you made it through Boston College without being tossed out.
After all, how could the largely dissident-Catholic faculty at B.C. tolerate your obviously genuine Catholic approach: &quot;Now what the Church teaches is true. It is that simple. &quot;
That counts as &quot;heresy&quot; at Boston College.
 - James</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:03:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/not-trusting-grace.html#comment-4699</link>
			<description>the answer of course is yes but you never answer the &quot;why&quot; - isn't this our favorite failure - consequentialism  - Bob M</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:24:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/not-trusting-grace.html#comment-4698</link>
			<description>And doesn't trusting in God's grace and truth mean not keeping individual institutions (parishes, schools, religious orders, social services, etc.) functioning as long as they have a Catholic veneer while not caring or knowing how to maintain a &quot;deeply&quot; Catholic identity?  When will our bishops make the word &quot;Catholic&quot; mean something, especially when an institution dares to use it to describe itself? - Anonymous</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:44:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
