<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Missing Persons</title>
		<description>Comments for Missing Persons at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:59:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/missing-persons.html#comment-5280</link>
			<description>&quot;Indeed, if you look at the statements of some neuroscientists, they have started to call it a “folk view” that we know things and can act freely. For them, it’s determinism all the way down.&quot;
From their viewpoint, they have to say that. But then, we have to say what we say. And if they weren't programmed for it, they would have no reason to care. - Mike Melendez</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:55:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2010/missing-persons.html#comment-5279</link>
			<description>Algorithm? Algorithm? Who wrote the algorithm? A room full of monkeys with eternity on their hands? The biologist's own language rats them out and they don't see it. Meanwhile the objects of applied scientific social methods (that would be us) fail to respond as programmed and the tanks must be sent in. Folk model indeed! The scientists seem unable to understand the outcomes of their own experiments.  - Other Joe</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:33:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
