<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>What &quot;God Said&quot; Matters</title>
		<description>Comments for What &quot;God Said&quot; Matters at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:06:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/what-qgod-saidq-matters.html#comment-6761</link>
			<description>Excellent post!

And excellent response Michael Paterson-Seymour! Thats something we should take into account, randomness and chance are two very different things indeed. - Aeneas</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 11:14:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/what-qgod-saidq-matters.html#comment-6747</link>
			<description>Excellent. Where can I find Benedict XVI's thoughts on these matters? - Dan Deeny</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 06:05:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/what-qgod-saidq-matters.html#comment-6746</link>
			<description>Thank you for an excellent article


However, when you say that the tenets of evolution &quot;involve appeals at some level to randomness and chance in the processes of change,&quot; I am far from convinced that we should equate the two.

The ordinary meaning of &quot;random&quot; is &quot;uncorrelated.&quot;  A random series of numbers is one no term of which is determined by any other; it cannot be generated by any algorithm shorter than itself.  The numbers of my friends, stored on my cell phone are a random series, but that series is certainly not the product of blind chance, but has been created (by me) with a rational purpose.  Similarly “random mutations” cannot be correlated with preceding events or environmental factors, but we need not conclude from that, that they are the product of mere “chance” - a rather slippery term
 - Michael Paterson-Seymour</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 02:15:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
