<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Margaret Sanger:  “Abortion is Dangerous and Vicious”</title>
		<description>Comments for Margaret Sanger:  “Abortion is Dangerous and Vicious” at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 13 out of 13 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:23:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-14402</link>
			<description>I agree with her that is vicious and inhumane act of man.. - wow gold</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 04:07:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9250</link>
			<description>I am pleased to hear that Sanger was, apparently, anti-abortion; however, this does not minimize nor trivialize her eugenic beliefs, which are deplorable.  Also, let's not forget that wherever and whenever a society accepts contraception,  birth control follows quickly on its heels! May we all be like Mary in our willingness to allow God's will to be done in our lives.  Perhaps the most pro-life verse in the entire Bible can be summed up in today's gospel reading: &quot;May it be done to me according to your will.&quot;  Mary chose LIFE!  She chose to birth the author of LIFE!  Praise God!(By the way, I am the happy mother of 10 precious children and will gladly accept as many more as the Lord chooses to bless me with! And no,I am not particularly wealthy, but I am rich!)God is SO GOOD!! - Sue McMahon</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:38:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9249</link>
			<description>&quot;Relgion over science: sound familiar?&quot;  Ummmm....no.  What are you talking about? 
 - Sue McMahon</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:26:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9206</link>
			<description>Dear Mr. Marlin,

I understand what you are getting at in your article. On the other hand, contraception is dangerous and vicious, too. Does the use of contraception not rend spousal relations? In your article, moreover, there is no mention made of the abortifacient end of many types of contraception.

Sincerely yours,

Edward - Edward G. O. Radler Rice</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:40:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9200</link>
			<description>What she meant was that the &quot;undesirable&quot; underclass ought to be sterilized, and abortions used if all other forms of birth control failed.

There was a little booklet she wrote and that was published and circulated among young women attending college in the 1920s.  My father's aunt was one young Catholic, (Franco-German 3rd Generation American middle class) that was attending a local college to be a school teacher.  

She left the Catholic faith, married (?) a man that was very involved with Sanger's movement, and died from a botched abortion that she was persuaded to have done.  Her mother was by her bedside when she died.  Story all the kids were told as they grew up, it was typhoid or influenza.  It was sepsis.

  - Sandra</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:03:09 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9199</link>
			<description>To all who've requested the source for the Margaret Sanger quote, please check back tomorrow. Mr. Marlin has it and will provide it a.s.a.p. -Brad Miner, senior editor

And here it is: Source on Sanger: Margaret Sanger, &quot;Birth Control Advances: A Reply to the Pope,&quot; 1931, Margaret Sanger Papers, Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College MSM S71-243. [See above — in the column — for a URL link]

And to HCSKnight: Please feel free not to contribute anything. - Brad Miner</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:53:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9197</link>
			<description>Do we have a reference for the Sanger quotes? - Mike</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:08:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9196</link>
			<description>Could you give us a reference as to where in Ms. Sanger's writings these quotes appear, so we may look up the entirety of them and their context?

Thanks. - Jim</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:53:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9195</link>
			<description>Thank you.  Where can we find the quote from Sanger &quot;dangerous and viscous&quot;. - c johnson</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:45:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9194</link>
			<description>Oh my!  It certainly takes a great deal of twisting to get Margret Sanger, the woman that told her father at her mothers funeral, &quot;You caused this. Mother is dead from having too many children.&quot; which drove her to coin the phrase &quot;birth control&quot; and made Enovid a reality to somehow support a religious ideology she fought her entire life until the very end.  Good try though. - Mr. Patton</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:33:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9193</link>
			<description>Good article, and surprising new fact. Please, where can one find this statement? It helps if sources are cited. - Kat</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:28:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9192</link>
			<description>Really? &quot;That’s right. Margaret Sanger actually stated that: “Birth control does not mean abortion.” Here are her exact words:&quot;

In today's world, so many claims are made regarding what someone in the past said that to not cite the source only begs the reader to assume the writer is more interested in their agenda than the truth.

It is disgusting to ask for a &quot;slew of $50, $75, and $100 contributions&quot; yet fail to in the most basic obligation a writer has to the dignity of others and the truth.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

AMDG
HCSKnight - HCSKnight</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:49:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/margaret-sanger-abortion-is-dangerous-and-vicious.html#comment-9191</link>
			<description>While I am am certainly happy to add this information to my arsenal of arguments against the culture of death word-view, I would like to know before I pull that arrow out of the quiver if Sanger continued to hold that view until she closed her eyes fro the last time.  After all, many serious people as well as those of foggy minds have changed their stances on things; we call former cases conversion experiences. Do any other TCT readers know of a change of stance by Sanger on either the abortion issue or the race issues?  If so, please share.  (Sorry if I've overstepped my bounds by making such a request.)  - Thomas C. Coleman, Jr.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:26:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
