<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Anger, Bad – and Good?</title>
		<description>Comments for Anger, Bad – and Good? at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 24 out of 20 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:16:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9371</link>
			<description>He who angers you controls you - Divine</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 20:05:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9370</link>
			<description>I do believe that most mothers have that 'mama bear' instinct that is their righteous anger on behalf of their children. I, as a mother, have felt that righteous anger and don't feel a bit of guilt for it. It is my job, my vocation, my duty to be protective of my children. Unfortunately, I also believe most modern mothers have had their 'mama bear' instinct effectively spayed...which is why I believe that you see many more cases of abuse by teachers/priests/those in positions of authority, because mothers have stopped feeling righteous anger on their children's behalf. (I also think that women being submissive to men other than their husbands have something to do with it to, but that's for another time. - The Ranter</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 17:52:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9367</link>
			<description>Rosemary,

Did I scream at my parents when I did not get what I want and was it effective? Darn tootin'!

What you describe is a fundamental difference between justice loving men and manipulative women. Of course, one can take a more measured approach and get your way! But then all you get it your way. You do not deliver justice. This difference is evidenced in males and females from the earliest even embryonic stages! - Austin Ruse</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 08:44:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9362</link>
			<description>Been reading the Catholic Thing since the beginning and have never commented.  Love your every-man approach, Mr. Ruse, and am thankful that you and the others are able to put to words what I know to be the truth.  God bless and keep on doing what you're doing.

I think Jesus with the whip is my image of the &quot;God-Hero&quot; Isaiah talks about.  Take it to the bad guys! - Phil</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:24:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9358</link>
			<description>Austin! You really are a silly man!  You just did not learn to negotiate with your parents first as a child.  Did you scream at them when you did not get what you wanted?  Of course not.

Men cannot read faces the way women can.  Once my husband and I missed a flight due to the crazy route our driver took.  When the airline person could not get us on the next flight, my normally-dear husband began to pressure her, really pressure her.  I could see her face get very tight.  Thank God for the little voice in my head that said, &quot;Negotiate!&quot;  I smiled, put my arm between my husband and the counter and told the airline server that we will take whatever is the next available flight.  She smiled now, too, but made no promises because we were now on standby.  We did get on a flight within the hour and made it to my husband's meeting in plenty of time.  We have to let go and let God! - Rosemary</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:03:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9356</link>
			<description>Thanks to all. The comments were much more interesting than the column itself! - Austin Ruse</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 06:30:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9353</link>
			<description>Thomas, after an agonizing hearing of Wagner's Ring Cycle, I do not recall one memorable tune. But, I suppose as Mark Twain once said, &quot;Wagner's music is not as bad as it sounds.&quot; - Grump</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:10:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9351</link>
			<description>To complete my comments on this subject:  Perhaps the word &quot;threatened&quot; [previous comment} was a poor choice.  Something like &quot;do not understand&quot; would have better served the point.

Also,I am fundamentally committed to the traditional understanding of men and women as two halves of one life-giving entity in marriage.  Manliness as expressed by all men of good will is a God-given good.  Yes, we are different.  We achieve goodness and show forth the virtues in different ways. For Catholic women, the model is Marian.  Like Mary we keep many things &quot;in our hearts and ponder them.&quot;  I do think that those of us who believe this is true must phrase our arguments carefully lest we provide fodder for those who would make us competitors or opponents in a battle for power.

It is true that I cannot whistle. I, like many women, have no desire to serve on the battlefield except in a medical support capacity. - Ars Artium</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 02:51:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9350</link>
			<description>Just for the record:  My closest friend and I engage in [intellectual] combat as a matter of course.  Our friendship began with a provocative question, one about Catholicism.  Our sparring match and our friendship continues.  She is a worthy opponent.  I have reason to believe that she finds me one as well. 

I was surprised to discover in reading these comments that the male writers should feel in any way threatened by the fact that friendship between &quot;worthy opponents&quot; exists between women as well.  It is true that our contests do not require boxing gloves.  

A Happy and Blessed New Year to all. - Ars Artium</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 02:26:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9348</link>
			<description>Thank you all for this discussion.  The humor has lightened the burden of hearing the news that the woman I mentioned earlier passed away yesterday.  I hadn't meant to say that I had been in contact with either of them but that they had not been in contact with each other.  The one fighting cancer allowed me to pass her contact info to the other, once a very devout Catholic but now a so-called freethinker, but the freethinker never followed through.  Anyway, Grump, you can whistle Wagner.  It's great fun to start with the Prelude to Tristan and have say that you're out of tune and then tell ask them how they know. Again, thanks for some welcome mirth.  Happy New Year to all!
 - Thomas C. Coleman, Jr.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:54:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9347</link>
			<description>Same topic -- and thinking of what Manfred has said above:

I'm not claiming that the Italians get everything right (they don't), but there's a reason why rape is basically nonexistent in Italy.  Girls still have brothers and cousins and fathers, to administer the Fate Worse Than Death....

If only, if only there had been a few publicly known cases of a father or big brother beating the living daylights out of a pederast (whatever the profession) ... I don't think I've ever heard of one ... - Tony Esolen</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:11:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9346</link>
			<description>A priest once made these three points in the confessional while discussing the difference between sinful anger and righteous indignation:

1. The essence of masculinity is gentleness.

2. We should seek to imitate our Lord at all times.

3. But, I suppose you did not have ready access to a whip! - Charles E Flynn</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:37:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9345</link>
			<description>Tony, I always whistle Puccini (and Verdi), but Wagner is unwhistable.  - Grump</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:17:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9344</link>
			<description>God did not make us slightly different.  He made us gloriously and comically and wonderfully different!  We are just too used to the differences even to notice them, and too ungrateful, each sex for the other, to care.

Trivial example: You are walking towards a street corner, and hear someone whistling an aria from Puccini.  You turn the corner and see that it's a man.  No surprise: it is always a man whistling Puccini.  I have no idea why this is so, but in my life I have always found it to be so.  My wife can whistle a little bit, but she would never be in that situation ... - Tony Esolen</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:36:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9343</link>
			<description>Among men there is the phenomenon of the worthy opponent, the enemy who is within a hair's breadth of becoming my friend.  I don't find that phenomenon among women -- at least I have never seen it in my life.  That doesn't mean that men are &quot;better&quot; than women; it does mean that male friendship is different from female friendship, and requires a little consideration.

Or more than a little consideration -- some protection and respect.  Examples:

In the Army, back in the days before soldierinas -- sorry, but when I see a woman in khakis I see a woman in khakis, who'd be overmatched physically by my teenage nephews -- when two guys got into a scrap, they'd put them in the boxing ring with gloves on.  That was by way of settling the dispute (at least), but I'll bet that many a friendship was born from it.

Democracy itself was born from such friendships.  The key institution among the Greeks was the gymnasion, where boys would be taught the poems of Homer, and how to wrestle and throw a spear and so forth.  In the gymnasion, physical training was in the nude (people hadn't invented gym shorts yet), and that was a powerful equalizer among classes.  It also built a culture of dynamic struggle, of competition that profited both of the competitors.  It wasn't just a thing-that-happened in Greece, accidentally, alongside the other thing, democracy.  The two were intimately related.

There's another question, and that's whether these dynamic friendships occur in the presence of women.  My observation suggests that they don't, and for some obvious reasons.

Yes, men fight wars; they fight bad wars, and they occasionally fight good wars.  But without the friendships we are talking about, there would never have been any nations to fight wars in the first place.  That is a straight anthropological fact.  One can see it as soon as one asks what it took to have a city, back in the days before refrigerated food and electronic surveillance and suchlike. - Tony Esolen</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:31:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9342</link>
			<description>Exceelent, excellent point Manfred!  That one needs to berepeated from every pulpit and in every ethics and moral theology course in the land.  Good way to see in a new year! - Thomas C. Coleman, Jr.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:01:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9341</link>
			<description>Austin, your insights on th idfferences between how the genders deal with anger and resentment are sure to draw ire and inidgnation from the female commisars, who are never nearly as beautful as Garbo in Ninotchka, but your words deliciously accurate.  I am 62, and when I tell my mother about corresponding with a nieghborhood bully from 55 years ago she can't understadn how I write to someone who gave me a bloody nose when I was seven.  At the same time I am trying to reunite to female friends to whom I haven't spoken in years, one dying of cancer, and I can't get anyplace.  My very orthodox wife is embarrassed by my anger at Catholics who tell other Catholics that it is just fine to suppot abortion.  Now, as to what is going on today among young men, instead of provoked anger we are seeing grauitous, sadistic attacks that are the result of the absence of male role models.  Oh, I almost forgot--we're not supposed to be angry at social policies that result in enormous numbers of fatherless homes.  Thanks for a good end of year column. - Thomas C. Coleman, Jr.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:39:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9339</link>
			<description>A few years ago, while listening to the news while I drove in my car, I heard a report that a teenager in Baltimore had shot and wounded the priest who had molested him.  In all the reports for decades of abuse by priests, rabbis and coaches, have you EVER heard a report that a father, brother, mother, uncle had ever done physical harm to the predator? One of my six sons was verbally abused by the Christian Brother principal in his high school on ONE occasion. My response? The next morning my attorney and I were in the principal's outer office while he had locked himself in his inner office. He refused to emerge and face us. The attorney followed up with letter sent certified mail relating what we would do to the Brother if his assault were repeated, with a copy to the homosexual Ordinary. The Brother was gone at the end of the semester. Do you know what happens in the absence of anger? Jerry Sandusky retires from Penn State in 1999 and still has keys to the sports facilities where he continued to sodomize ten year old boys for years. - Manfred</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:49:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9338</link>
			<description>Well, now some observations are in order:

1) This is an excellent article and an excellent apology for male temper tantrums.

2) Women who have learned humility and true love know when to &quot;pop their corks&quot; and when to let it go.

3) If the male of the species is so good at being angry and &quot;turning on a dime&quot;, why have their been so many vicious, deadly wars, acts of vengeance, et al throughout history.

4) Nope, when the Almighty created us, He made us slightly  different, but totally equal.  After the Fall we became equally stupid.  That is sad, but that is also true.

5) Again, this is a great article with fine spiritual meat to nourish both sexes equally.  There is a place for righteous anger, but it is a very small place, and it needs to be rightly directed. - Gina Nakagawa</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:42:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/anger-bad-and-good.html#comment-9337</link>
			<description>I am thinking of two events.  One is biblical - that of Jacob's wrestling with the angel.  The other is an event in my own life, a rather commonplace event - my attendance at a Mass at St. Jean Baptiste Church in New York City.  

The Mass, sung in Latin, began in procession of a robed, all-male choir.  As was customary at that time, there were no women on the altar.  It was (obviously) very long ago.  I was a young girl but did not in any way think myself excluded.  I was in fact not excluded.  I have not forgotten the beauty; the memory has enriched my life.
 
But what has this to do with Jacob and his struggle?  Everything.  I had read the story and, as with the Mass, identified with it as an inheritor of the Jewish tradition through Jesus and as an acting person, a child of God, who by God's gift had been born as a member of the female half of the human race.  

In neither case did it occur to me that I was not part of the event through passionate involvement in life and in love of God. That I am female was not the point.  

I also have striven &quot;with man and with God&quot;.  If there are &quot;feminizers&quot; who forbid righteous anger, their number does not include myself, my daughters, daughters-in-law, or many friends.  

I believe that Professor Esolen did not intend to include the entire female sex in his condemnation of &quot;feminizers&quot;.  It does seem though that he is privileging the idea of struggle and righteous anger as masculine.  It is not.     
 - Ars Artium</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:07:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
