<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Do Atheists Reject Without Understanding?</title>
		<description>Comments for Do Atheists Reject Without Understanding? at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:56:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/do-atheists-reject-without-understanding.html#comment-171</link>
			<description>Point A: you can''t get to God via the scientific method. The existence of God is a metaphysical question, not a physical one. St. Thomas Aquinas did not propose hypotheses to explain phenomena. He reasoned to the truth demonstratively.

Point B: The true reason few people are taken in by atheists is that everyone innately grasps that a first, uncaused cause is required in order to explain the existence of everything. As St. Thomas explains, this cause is what we mean by the name &quot;God.&quot; - James the Least</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:21:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>the qustion is why?</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/do-atheists-reject-without-understanding.html#comment-170</link>
			<description>This is one of the most eloquent descriptions of the concept of God I have ever read, but I feel you stop short of acknowledging the possibility that it is organized religion itself; the mythical and ritualized structure of it, that leads directly to the concept of God as a tangible entity that can be defined, explained, and contacted conversationally. It is these beliefs that result in the scientific approach of finding God that always inevitably fails. - z</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:37:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
