<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Behaviorists Are Back</title>
		<description>Comments for The Behaviorists Are Back at http://www.thecatholicthing.org , comment 1 to 10 out of 10 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:21:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Believer</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-469</link>
			<description>Current Economic problems can be solved not by any Human Expert but only by God.Let the Country obey the Commandments of God.No more  sins of immorality- Abortions,Same sex marriages , Homosexual/Lesbian relationships. Fear God .Let Catholic  Hierarchy switch back to Traditional  Mass , Sacraments and catechism. They can save,Will they listen to the call of God. Establish the Kingdom of Jesus.He will save not only the U.S. but the whole world. Please be a LEADER. KNOW THAT OBAMA CANNOT DO IT. - David</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:43:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Believer</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-468</link>
			<description>Majoirty of Americans are betting  future on OBAMA. Soon they will understand that they were absolutely wrong. The so called Economic theories ,behavioural /pschological  theories have  failed.The Political systems ,be it Commnunism or  democracy can not provide  the lasting solutions. The solution is in Human behaviour . ? Its only the Behaviour that pleases The Almighty God. The  horrible sins committed by Abortions , Homosexuality , Same sex marriages. Give them up. Turn to God . No FOCA - David</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:25:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>teacher</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-463</link>
			<description>Worry?  I'd buy popcorn and watch the show.  Behaviorism never worked in the classroom and won't work in the economy.  We went through all this in the 1960s and 1970s and the schools have largely tossed these ideas. - Tom Byrne</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:11:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>61q18</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-404</link>
			<description>It is only a matter of time before partial birth abortion, embryo harvesting and genetic engineering become routine.  Barack Obama is beholding to this. Just think - we can have the deseigner baby</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:33:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Well Done!</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-402</link>
			<description>So, because &quot;behavioral economics&quot; and &quot;behavioralism&quot; have the same root, the author thinks the one proceeds from the other?  Would it have been asking too much for him to have checked on exactly what behavioral economics is before gassing off with this ludicrous &quot;analysis&quot; and warning?

Or does he also think that, e.g., a cubic zirconium is a zirconium as painted by Picasso and Braque?  In which case, never mind.  Carry on gassing. - Mr. Wonderful</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:11:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sknner/Marx</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-396</link>
			<description>Has no one else thought to connect the dots between Marxism-Leninsim and Skinnerism?  Lenin believed that once humans were forced long enough to behave communistically, without families or private property, such behavior would become automatic and the &quot;apparatus of coercion&quot; (the State) would disappear like &quot;a vestigial organ.&quot;  The meritocracy is the Party.  This is what atheism (Marx's or Skinner's) leads to.  Viva Crsito Rey!  Only the Social Kingship of Christ will save the world! - Thomas C. coleman, Jr.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:19:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Merit</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-395</link>
			<description>Eleven paragraphs of philosophical analysis and then abruptly back to the now old canard  of Obama as the &quot;problem&quot;.  It seems to me we could have benefited from  some meritocray over the last eight years. - Ron</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:48:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Professor of Law</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-394</link>
			<description>Finally, I wonder where you get the idea that 1970s radicals embraced Skinnerian behaviorism.  That's a stretch, to say the least. - Perry Dane</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:34:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Professor of Law</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-393</link>
			<description>I think that you're incorrectly inflating contemporary economic psychologists with old-fashioned Skinnerian behaviorists.  The two groups are radically different in their assumptions about how the human mind works.  In the current context, economic psychologists, far from leading us to a &quot;brave new world,&quot; can simply provide some useful practical insights into, for example, which form of government spending might most quickly and effectively stimulate private productive economic activit - Perry Dane</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:34:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thecatholicthing.org/columns/2008/the-behaviorists-are-back.html#comment-391</link>
			<description>I love this site but sometimes I am pretty shocked by how far you guys stretch these ideas.  Yes, it's fun to do and serves a philosophical purpose but it becomes borderline silly sometimes.  I am afraid that you risk losing the respect of readers who may not be as grounded in the Truth as you guys are.  Some people might write you off when they see you writing things like Obama's &quot;BNW.&quot;  Funny and thought-provoking for some, but for others- perhaps a little more tact?  Just a little. - Charlie</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:31:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
