banner

The Active and Contemplative Life

Outside the Dominican parish where I am privileged to attend Mass on Sundays, there is a statue (see below) of that marvelous Dominican saint: Martin de Porres.

Juan Martin de Porres Velázquez was born in Lima, Peru in 1579, a mulatto, or mixed race child, the illegitimate son of a Spanish nobleman and a freed slave from Panama. After the birth of his sister two years later, his father abandoned the family. His mother supported the children by doing laundry. Martin grew up in poverty, a social outcast in Peru, but was able to go to a primary school for two years, after which he learned the medical arts of the day at age 15 from a barber-surgeon.

Although by law, Martin was barred from becoming a full member of any religious order because of his race, he asked the Dominicans of Holy Rosary Priory to accept him as a donado, a volunteer whose duties included performing menial tasks in the priory, such as kitchen work, laundry, and cleaning. This is why he is often depicted with a broom.

In time, Martin was allowed to take vows as a member of the Third Order of Saint Dominic and was assigned to the infirmary. Thus began his famous ministry to the sick. For brevity’s sake, let’s just say he was the Mother Theresa of Calcutta of his day. Numerous miraculous healings were attributed to him, and he ministered to both Spanish nobles and recently arrived African slaves, without discrimination. In later years, he founded a residence for orphans and abandoned children in Lima.

All of this sounds very impressive to us, who live in an age that tends to value the virtues of the active life. In the Biblical story of Martha and Mary, previous generations often favored Mary, the contemplative, the one who sat at Jesus’s feet staring up at him, enraptured with every word and gesture. Today, many of us tend to prefer Martha, the busy one, the one who actually “gets something done,” who prepares the meal and feeds the guests.

And yet, if we thought about it, we’d have to admit that we’ve probably known a Martha or two in our lives: women who are so busy cooking and preparing and rushing about that they never have time to actually sit and talk to their guests. “If I wanted someone rushing about putting food in front of me,” one is tempted to say, “I would have gone to a restaurant. I come to someone’s house to enjoy a visit as a guest, not as an especially demanding customer.”

Saint Juan Martin de Porres Velázquez
Saint Juan Martin de Porres Velázquez [click to expand]
What’s missing often enough is a sense of relaxation, of welcome, and crucially, of acceptance into a person’s heart and home. What is needed is a bit of the listening and attentive Mary to go with the ever-busy Martha. So too with us.

Looking at the statue of St. Martin, one sees what the artist has attempted to capture with the broom at Martin’s side and the cross at his breast: the unity the saint achieved between the contemplative and active dimensions of his existence. He was known to spend hours deep in prayer. It is said that, once, a fire broke out on the altar before which he was praying, and in all the confusion of putting it out, Martin did not stir from prayer – a story I might have considered apocryphal except for the fact that I have known people like this. Either way, everything we know about St. Martin suggests he was a man of prayer – what in the ancient world they would have called a man of theoria or “contemplation.”

What we should not miss in someone like St. Martin is the degree to which his life was made possible by a specifically Christian development of pagan Greek notions of the contemplative life. Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle seem to have considered the contemplative life to be the highest human activity – the activity by which the human person brings his or her mind into contact with the highest principle of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty. And yet, among such Greek thinkers, the life of contemplation stood in stark contrast to the life of servile labor. In the world of Plato and Aristotle, servants worked, so that an elite few could live the “life of the mind” and spend their time contemplating the highest things.

What the Christian faith proclaims is that the source of all Truth, Goodness, and Beauty has deigned to take on the human condition. The Word that was “in the beginning, that was with God and was God,” has “become flesh and dwelt among us, having ‘emptied himself’ of his divinity and ‘put on’ our humanity.” With this, the contemplative life would never be the same. It’s not only that now a slave can legitimately attain to the heights formerly reserved only for the few. Now it is perhaps only those who “put on Christ” and serve the rest who can attain to such exalted heights.

Offer a course called “Christian Spirituality” or “Christian Mysticism” and plenty of students will sign up. Make a prerequisite for the course cleaning toilets and sweeping hallways in the building for the semester, and enrollments would drop radically. Students like to read about the Benedictine life; it’s the reality itself, that amazing balance of work and prayer, ora et labora, that they can scarcely imagine. Why? Too much work and too much prayer. We prefer instead a life of busy-ness. Large doses of empty activity that keep us numb to the emptiness of what we’re doing and to the absence of the One whose presence is the only thing that could fill our emptiness.

If you like St. Martin’s life story, understand this: there’s no St. Martin without the cross at his breast and the broom at his side.

Randall Smith

Randall Smith

Randall Smith is the Scanlan Professor of Theology at the University of St. Thomas in Houston, Texas.

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments relevant to columns that are civil, concise, and respectful of other contributors. We do not publish comments with links to other websites or other online material.
  • ron a.

    It seems to me that the aspects of Jesus’ life that are most ignored, or down played, by the many, especially the ‘social justice’ crowd, are His ubiquitous prayer life and His priority of service to His Father, His obedience. Our mission, as followers of Christ, living with Him as our ‘pattern’, must certainly begin there—and the rest will follow. In this WAY, Mary did choose “the BETTER part”.

  • Arden Abeille

    This little gem of thought (Randall Smith’s entire post) is both beautiful and deeply true.

    “Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle seem to have considered
    the contemplative life to be the highest human activity – the activity
    by which the human person brings his or her mind into contact with the
    highest principle of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty. And yet, among such
    Greek thinkers, the life of contemplation stood in stark contrast to the
    life of servile labor. In the world of Plato and Aristotle, servants
    worked, so that an elite few could live the “life of the mind” and spend
    their time contemplating the highest things.”

    This particularly strikes me. It seems our culture now rejects BOTH of these activities. We seem, as a society, to want NEITHER ora NOR labora. Our strongest desire seems to be to have enough money so that we can have the time and unlimited resources to sit around hypnotized by somebody else’s notion of what we should consume on an electronic screen.

    As a result, we have either no notion of Truth, Goodness, or Beauty whatsoever, or a completely skewed notion of these things, increasingly deformed by the culture’s deformed notion of them: that Truth is relative (which really means it is a phantom, it does not exist); that Goodness simply means not actively causing physical harm to another person (unless that person is currently living inside another’s womb, in which case it’s okay since you can’t see them easily), which is of course not a positive notion, but simply a “definition” by exclusion (we don’t know what it IS, but we think we know at least one thing it is NOT); that Beauty, like Truth, is whatever you think it is, which mostly translates into whatever the “movers and shakers” think it is, which mostly is a pathologically deformed idea (stemming from the dissolution of Truth) that results in things like visual art that is purposefully ugly/dis-ordered/broken/literally made of garbage but called beautiful, and standards of female beauty that overtly and obviously reflect states of physical illness (a post-pubertal human female 6 feet tall who purposefully maintains her weight at less than 120 pounds is, without question, endangering her health).

  • bernie

    St. Thomas – A contemplative is not one who does, but one who so disposes his life. Being a monk is one way, I hope, and earning money to raise a family is another.

  • Howard Kainz

    Your contrast between courses in Christian Mysticism and sweeping hallways is too stark. It depends on the course. In my Ethics courses and some other courses, I offered an alternative to some exams in favor of community service (verified and with a report at the end of the semester) — working with the homeless, tutoring elementary students in mid-city schools, helping in a women’s shelter or nursing home, or the county jail, etc., and the majority of students took advantage of this opportunity. Of course an option like this wouldn’t fit in very well in a course on mysticism.

  • Randall B. Smith

    The author replies: Prof. Kainz, one has to wonder why such an option would be acceptable in an “Ethics” class but not in a class on “mysticism.” Is it perhaps because, as one wag (Fr. Ernest Fortin, I am told) once put it: “Mysticism: it begins in mist, and ends in schism.” I stand by my point. To Bernie, clearly raising and supporting a family is another important vocation, one which involve its own balance of work and prayer. And while “earning money to raise a family” can certainly be an act of love and service, I would not wish for people to imagine that “earning money” and “raising a family” are totally interchangeable notions. One earns money to “support” a family; one raises a family by being present with them. No one can “raise” your kids but you (as I have no doubt you are aware). So I take your point: “work” can be work to support a family. There will still need to be time for prayer. They can (and indeed must) go together. As for Ms. Abeille’s post, she is too kind about my essay; but her post is a “little gem” of its own. (Just take out all those ugly slashes next time. What you have to say is profoundly true enough that you should allow the beauty to shine forth without compromising it with ugly shortcuts of that sort. Trust yourself. Trust your reader. What you have to say is important enough.)

    • Howard Kainz

      Randall, I was just making a pedagogical point. I asked all the students who engaged in the community service option to make applications to theories or problems we had discussed in the ethics class. On the other hand, when I taught Metaphysics or 19th century German philosophy, I thought it would be stretching things to ask students to make the applications to course content.
      I am from a Dominican background, and agree with the ideal, “contemplata aliis tradere,” — combining contemplation and action. I expect we have consensus on that.

  • John Nagy

    Thank you, Randall, for the insight about the transformative Christian contribution to the tradition of contemplative life. St. Martin is a saint for us all in that regard — whatever our adopted forms of service, work or busy-ness, we can always challenge ourselves to grow in prayer and in the kind of contemplative joy that enables us to greet others in a way befitting guests, and not mere customers. I’d like to take that course in Christian mysticism you propose. For now, my kitchen floor needs mopping.

  • Fr. Dominic Legge, O.P.

    The sculptor of the statue of St. Martin was himself a Dominican friar, Fr. Thomas McGlynn. There is a great deal of theological depth behind it. You can Google him.