A Pro-Choicer Who Defends NFP

In the introduction to her book Sweetening the Pill, Holly Grigg-Spall makes it clear in that she is politically pro-choice and has no problem with various “barrier” methods of contraception – condoms, diaphragms, spermicides, etc. But she is spearheading a movement against the contraceptive pill and its derivatives (Depo-Provera injections, Nexplanon implants, NuvaRing vaginal rings, the Mirena hormonal IUD, etc.), and not only with her book, but her website, interviews, and an upcoming documentary due for release in 2016.

What is her motivation for going so blatantly against the grain of Planned Parenthood, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, U.S. and U.N. agencies, and the others promoting cutting-edge scientific contraception throughout the world?

She mentions physical health risks, seldom discussed by the mainstream media – the fact that the contraceptive pill significantly increases women’s risk of developing heart disease and breast, cervical and liver cancers; that hormonal contraceptives are ranked by the World Health Organization as a class-one carcinogen alongside tobacco and asbestos; that the hormonal injection Depo-Provera has a black-box warning that it is detrimental to the bone health of teen girls. And so forth.

But her main concern has to do with the mental and emotional effects of the pill. She cites a 1998 study from the University of North Carolina, a 2001 Kinsey Institute study, a 2005 Monash University study, and 2008 Lakehead University research, all of which show a consensus regarding the negative impact of hormonal contraceptives on emotional well-being.

Contraceptive pills are used as alternative treatments for physical ailments such as heavy bleeding, irregular periods, period pain, endometriosis and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). But why, she asks, should perfectly healthy women start taking a medication, often from teen years to menopause, which has innumerable side effects – on thyroid, adrenalin, blood glucose, and testosterone levels, etc.?

Basically, what the pill does is to use artificial hormones to put young fertile women into a state in which they will eventually never ovulate (even with the “false periods” that accompany many medications) and will experience the physiological changes common to women in menopause – infertility, increased risk for stroke and breast cancer, insulin resistance, immuno-suppression, lessening of libido, etc.

In other words, we are witnessing the strange phenomenon of women meticulously careful about diet, exercise, healthy living, and often opting for a “natural” lifestyle – but deciding to take a prescription drug that uses artificial hormones to stop all menstruation, adding to the pollution of the waterways – not to mention the disruption of their own physiology.

Holly Grigg-Spall
Ms. Grigg-Spall

The common motivation for enduring all this is, of course, fear of pregnancy. Holly Grigg-Spall, using hormonal contraceptives consistently from teen years into her late twenties, sums up her experience: migraines, constant bleeding and nausea, frequent changes of prescriptions, but never wanting to stop, because “I was petrified of pregnancy.”

The pressures in our day are enormous – parents (like Barak Obama) terrified that their teenage daughters might be “punished” with childbirth, doctors (even pediatricians) assuring the “health” of their young female patients, a modern economy needing women to be free for work without “female issues” – not to mention partners who want wives or girlfriends to be available 24/7 for sex.

Even women experiencing clear negative side effects from the pill may hesitate to stop using them because of the “good” aspects. Teenagers using contraceptives discover not only that their heavy periods stop, but also that acne starts disappearing, their hair is less greasy. And continuing into their twenties and thirties, says Holly Grigg-Spall, “We are free of messy periods, we may have clearer skin, be slimmer, we may have bigger breasts, and we are supposedly rid of troublesome PMS.”

Stopping the pill may also result in “withdrawal” symptoms similar to cessation from other drugs – insomnia, irritability, etc. And women who want to become pregnant may find that it takes many months to start ovulating normally after years on the pill. But for women who decide they no longer want to live like a man, without periods, in perpetual menopause (and with various symptoms of menopause), withdrawal may open up new vistas.

Holly Grigg-Spall cites her experience, which coincided with experiences of many others:

“On the pill I was stagnant – physically, mentally and emotionally. I would get stuck in both feelings and thoughts. I could not think clearly. I could not progress. Off the pill, my body is going through changes throughout the month. I experience the waves and peaks, the ebbs and flows and all of this moves me. This movement is energizing and galvanizing. . . .When I came off the pill it was like the lights got switched back on for me. I soon had the capacity to feel deeply and fully in a way I had not felt for many years and with that I had the capacity to truly connect.”

Her solution, as an alternative to hormonal contraceptives, is Natural Family Planning (NFP), after the pattern of the “Creighton method,” but without its “oppressive” Catholic motivations – in particular, the secular counterparts, Fertility Awareness Methods (FAM), such as the “Justisse method.” She cites statistics from comprehensive studies at the University of Heidelberg and elsewhere showing that FAM is as effective as the pill. She spreads the good news about emancipation from the pill on her website, in an instruction manual (Coming off the Pill: a Guide), and, as mentioned above, with a documentary movie. She also plugs a new smartphone and tablet “app” – Kindara, as a “sophisticated and comprehensive” means of tracking one’s periods.

A Catholic proponent of NFP would prefer to see an emphasis on the natural law, and would view the problems chronicled by Grigg-Spall as empirical manifestations of flouting that law. But like St. Thomas Aquinas, who emphasized that we should appreciate the truth no matter what its source, we should regard this movement, which focuses on one of the most potent snares of the sexual revolution, as a step in the right direction.

Howard Kainz

Howard Kainz

Howard Kainz is emeritus professor of philosophy at Marquette University. His most recent publications include Natural Law: an Introduction and Reexamination (2004), Five Metaphysical Paradoxes (The 2006 Marquette Aquinas Lecture), The Philosophy of Human Nature (2008), and The Existence of God and the Faith-Instinct (2010).

  • erin

    Perhaps now that her mental stagnation has cleared, she can think herself to the fullness of other divine realities. Praying for the gift of grace to be open to Truth.

  • RainingAgain

    I have often wondered at the plague of young women in my area suffering and dying from breast cancer. However, bringing up the subject of contraceptive methods is not something easy to do in everyday conversation. As Erin points out, the effect on the ability to think is intriguing and calls out for some further research, I would think. It is also edifying that following the facts always seems to lead us in the one direction.

  • Joyfully

    Mr. Kainz, I appreciate you paraphrasing St. Thomas in your last paragraph; only 11% of the population in my region claims Catholicism as their religion. Most of my conversations happen to be with other Catholics and I find myself reminding them that the “they”s we often wish would just cooperate with Catholic thought – the Truth of mind, body, and soul – quite simply do not acknowledge the same final purpose and end that we Catholics do.

    Many people do not hold the Truth dear and just want to make it through this Earthly existance with the most pleasure and least amount of pain and for them it’s “to Hell with Heaven”. We have to strive as individuals to keep our own and ownselves on the right path in the modern minefield.

    Holly Grigg-Spall is using a “hook” rather than “crook” to achieve a good end, let us hope she has great success with the population she is serving.

  • It’s nice to see NFP and alternatives to the pill get some attention. Society makes life difficult for its women–and men, to some degree–when it equates sexual activity with any other bodily function, like eating or sleeping, that the human body must perform by necessity. NFP happily restores some freedom and control that people used to have and respect in this regard. Contraceptives, far from liberating a person, too often determine one’s attitude toward sex and fertility, leaving very little choice or questioning in the matter: have as much sex as possible (no matter whether it’s enjoyable or not), and have as few babies as possible (since kids are burdens).

    Nevertheless, I still have to scratch my head at a women who will pore through exhaustive studies of women’s health and contraceptives, considering all aspects (except the spiritual ones), and still find it in herself to condone abortions and unregulated copulation. Both of these things wreak havoc on the health of the relationships and the people involved.

  • George Sim Johnston

    The link between prolonged use of the Pill by young women and a greater possibility of breast cancer is now irrefutable. Does anyone notice the contradiction of the federal government and Planned Parenthood promoting the Pill on the grounds of “reproductive health”?

  • Loved As If

    I finally understood the horror of of the pill when a friend told me that, for healthy women, it was like a doctor prescribing medication that would quiet a healthy person’s heart because the sound of it beating as he fell asleep was annoying. The term, “reproductive health,” in re the pill, is terrifying doublespeak. I pray Ms. Grigg-Spall can convince at least some women to stop using it or never begin. Aligning our behaviour to natural law tends to have spiritual affects far greater than we imagine.

  • bernie

    She passes over the apparent reality
    that abortions, especially repeated abortions, which is her fall-back
    position, also have consequences of the same scope and kind as
    artificial means of avoiding conception. Nature frustrated is an
    unforgetting and unforgiving master. Frankly, I do not understand
    what Dr. Kainz would have us emulate in Ms. Grigg-Spall. Better if
    she forgot the NFP and had a few babies to offset the impending
    collapse of Western (world) populations. And yes, the pill is a
    horror. Breast cancer was a likely consequence in the life of a
    close relative who took them for years to regulate severe issues
    before being forced to have a hysterectomy.

    • Howard Kainz

      ” Frankly, I do not understand what Dr. Kainz would have us emulate in Ms. Grigg-Spall.”
      I am not suggesting emulation. The promotion of NFP has been stereotyped as merely Catholic and as an ineffective rehash of the “rhythm” method. Grigg-Spall’s movement helps dissipate these stereotypes.

  • cameron

    I remember talking to a nurse years ago, now retired, who worked at a children’s hospital. She said that in recent decades she was seeing more and varied forms of cancer in infants and children than she witnessed at the beginning of her career. In fact she said cancer was rarely seen in children back then. I asked her what she thought might be causing it? She said the Pill. It is a hormone that tricks the female body into thinking itself pregnant. This in turn leads the body to produce other hormones and chemicals that facilitate the growth of the non-existent child. She thought that this bodily response was, for some reason in some infants, stimulating the growth of cancer cells. I hope I am portraying her line of thought accurately. Anyway, don’t expect any research into such a relationship. The sexual revolution, like any political revolution, accepts that there will be casualties for the greater cause.



RECENT COLUMNS

Archives