banner

On the Fate of Jesuit Donkeys

When I arrived back in Los Gatos from Georgetown, I mentioned in a column (The Catholic Thing, April 15, 2013) that on this property we had five “jackasses.” They were denizens of the land. I recounted that they were in a field above the house and had followed me down a trail one afternoon to their feeding pen. This scene occasioned some learned comments from the brethren about the nature of Schall’s “following.”

Meantime, two of the jennies (female donkeys) had foals, cute little critters in fact. The Jack, not a practicing monogamist, and the two jennies, unlike mules, can be quite adept at reproducing their kind. The donkeys became a center of local curiosity. We have trails through the property with “No Trespassing” signs on the fences.

These donkeys have no obvious purpose. I once suggested to the superior that we open a business of giving two-dollar donkey rides as a means of support. He thought it a splendid idea and shrewdly appointed Schall to run the operation. No more was ever heard of this otherwise brilliant proposal.

Thanks to its Italian Jesuit founding in the 19th century, this institution had a winery (“Novitiate of Los Gatos”) with acres of grape fields. Donkeys were used to plough the steep hillsides in back of the house. Today, the donkeys are more in the order of pets. And that is the origin of their sad fate, which I will now recount. It is a classic example of what happens in an overly legalized society.

One afternoon, I was walking down one of the hills. A rather upset lady stopped me. She complained that the donkeys were emaciated. We Jesuits were starving them. Naturally, I claimed innocence of any deliberate tendency to “donkey-cide.” Edgar, the local keeper of the animals, assured me that the donkeys were well fed and watered. They grazed contentedly on the grassy slopes around the house.

Many people would come up. They gave the donkeys human food that, while well intentioned, was not really good for them. Rumor had it that this lady took the issue to the Humane Society. Superiors imagined headlines in the local paper: “Jesuits Starve Donkeys.”

But this was only the beginning. Particularly after the baby donkeys were born, mothers would bring little kids up to see them. The more agile ones would climb over the fence to pet and hug the donkeys. It was a charming scene. The kids loved it.

Donkeys, however, are animals. This is a first principle, as Aristotle said. They can kick, bite, and slobber. The specter of enterprising lawyers came up. Even with “No Trespassing” signs, if some little kid were kicked by a donkey, the headlines would read: “Jesuit Donkey Kicks Local Youth.” You see the problem?

To anticipate the worst-case scenario is a function of the human mind. So, following Ignatius of Loyola‘s rules for decision-making, it was determined to find another home for our good donkeys. Even with every precaution taken, there is little possibility today of escaping oodles of law suits in such a situation.

So the prudence of this world determined that the donkey-keepers look around for other farms that would purchase or take the animals. Places were soon enough found. Donkey friendships and families were broken up. The threats of lawyers rule the land.

Now our property no longer hears the familiar “Hee-Haw” of the Jack to wake up a slumbering Jesuit or provide a good conversation at lunch. Our place is now more silent. We once had some horses and chickens on this land, but they, like the donkeys, are no more.

From my youth, I recalled my uncles’ farms when they still had smaller family farms in Iowa. I remember vividly the farm sounds – cows, horses, mules, hens, roosters, cats, dogs, bulls, hogs, sheep, turkeys, tractors, windmills, not to mention the birds and field animals. I remember yarns about hearing corn grow on hot summer nights. Today, we hear the noise of the highway to Santa Cruz below, airplanes above, cell phones everywhere. What was the name of that song? “The Sounds of Silence”?

Donkeys appear in Scripture. King David rode a donkey. Jesus Himself rode one into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday. Mary is said to have ridden a donkey into Egypt. I read somewhere of a Muslim rule that Christians could not ride horses but had to use donkeys.

Donkeys are famous “beasts of burden” in mountains and tough trails. They are sure-footed. Presumably they share with mules the quality of stubbornness, for which quality something is to be said.

Is Cecil the African Lion’s story sadder than the legal shadow over our donkey family? I would not venture to estimate. Animal “rights” and “liabilities” these days have strange consequences, even in the now more silent hills above Los Gatos.

James V. Schall, S.J.

James V. Schall, S.J.

James V. Schall, S.J., who served as a professor at Georgetown University for thirty-five years, is one of the most prolific Catholic writers in America. Among his recent books are The Mind That Is Catholic, The Modern Age, Political Philosophy and Revelation: A Catholic Reading, Reasonable Pleasures, and, new from St. Augustine's Press, Docilitas: On Teaching and Being Taught.

The Catholic Thing welcomes comments relevant to columns that are civil, concise, and respectful of other contributors. We do not publish comments with links to other websites or other online material.
  • Dave Fladlien

    This is really a sad story, but thanks for sharing it. It points out all too well what kind of overly protectionist society we have built. Why aren’t parents responsible if their kids climb into an area marked as dangerous? We can’t hold anyone accountable any more, unless they are someone we can sue.

    This is sick. But it’s what our society has become.

  • Michael Paterson-Seymour

    One recalls G K Chesteron

    When fishes flew and forests walked
    And figs grew upon thorn,
    Some moment when the moon was blood
    Then surely I was born.

    With monstrous head and sickening cry
    And ears like errant wings,
    The devil’s walking parody
    On all four-footed things.

    The tattered outlaw of the earth,
    Of ancient crooked will;
    Starve, scourge, deride me: I am dumb,
    I keep my secret still.

    Fools! For I also had my hour;
    One far fierce hour and sweet:
    There was a shout about my ears,
    And palms before my feet.

  • Michael Dowd

    Such a sad story. It’s seems that our society is hell bent on eliminating all that gives life it’s wonder and joy–God included. We are now fully protected, insured, coddled but certainly not happier. How did this happen? Perhaps Fr. Schall could explain.

    • Georgetown and Lawyers trained at this and other Jesuit institutions have certainly figured large in the downfall, many of the Obergefell judges were Jesuit trained. Given the predilection towards anti Catholic progressiveness by certain Jesuit trained politicians, the Order has much to answer for. Fr Schall is the ONLY Jesuit in the United States that I would trust with an explanation.

      • SJ Man

        I would add Fr. Mitch Pacwa from EWTN to that group too.

        • I do not know enough about him to judge.

          • SJ Man

            He really is rock solid and orthodox. I’ve heard his talks and seen him host two programs on EWTN (Threshold of Hope & EWTN Live) on many occasions and have yet to hear him say anything that is contrary to the Church and the magisterial teachings. You should Google him or better yet, watch one of those programs in the archives.

            I do agree wholeheartedly that the Jesuit order has been questionable for the past number of years. Unfortunately, I’ve seen the Franciscans going the same route

        • Kmbold

          And Father Joseph Fessio! Imagine, only three…

    • RainingAgain

      Michael, perhaps this is a sign that perhaps unlimited immigration into both the US and America might be beneficial. It would appear to be the most likely outcome of the century, according to the Pew Research Institute. Some might say it would be tragic to see Western Civilisation overwhelmed by relative barbarians, but our Civilisation seems to be already (long?) gone and perhaps such an outcome would be morally and humanly preferable to the decadence our former civilisation appears set upon in its final decline? It does encourage me that the projected biggest population explosion is in sub-Saharan Africa where orthodox Christianity seems to be dominant and increasing.

  • grump

    Nice “tale,” Father. When I read the part about the emaciated donkeys I was reminded of the dilemma known as Burdian’s Ass, i.e. that two bundles of hay placed equidistant from a hungry donkey will leave it undecided as to which to eat, thus starving itself.

    I think nearly all creatures have a purpose save mainly one. As Ogden Nash put it:

    God in his wisdom made the fly
    And then forgot to tell us why.

    Poems by Ogden Nash : 85 / 124

    «
    prev. poem

    next poem
    »

    The Fly – Poem by Ogden Nash

    God in his wisdom made the fly
    And then forgot to tell us why.

    • Michael Paterson-Seymour

      Or Belloc

      “’He prayeth best who loveth best
      All creatures great and small.’
      The streptococcus is the test
      I love him least of all.”

  • Lancelot Blackeburne

    A sad story indeed. But why not stand up and fight against this rubbish.

    Worried the local paper will write stories about starving donkeys and donkeys kicking kids? The newspapers and other MSM are going to write critical stories no matter what; it’s what they do. Why give in to it simply because you anticipate it might happen.

    Worried about potential litigation over a donkey possibly kicking someone? I notice the Jesuits have trails through their property and apparently allow the public to use those trails. Wouldn’t it have been better to cut off public access to these trails so kids weren’t coming onto the property where there some remote possibility of the kids, or adults for that matter, being injured by these donkeys? In other words, get rid of the trails and the potential litigants, not the donkeys.

    But now, because of concerns about adverse publicity and potential lawsuits, the quality of life at this Jesuit retreat is diminished. Extend that result to society as a whole and you get the idea of society’s general quality of life being diminished because people get rid of perfectly reasonable simple pleasures or actions due to concerns about adverse publicity of bogus lawsuits. Little by little, the quality of life erodes and you’re left with what…….?

    Why not take a stand about these issues. Tell the “animal welfare” woman to take a hike. Cut off public access to the trails rather than get rid of the donkeys because of fears some bonehead might get hurt.

    And perhaps if we as a society took a firmer stand on such seemingly small things, the quality of life would be improved.

  • anantwort

    It is a sad tale but the outcome shows the ‘culturization’ of the mind. Zoos are always wary of lawsuits and take measures to frustrate actions that could cause them, i.e., plexiglass shields, security pits, high metal fences, etc. With all these precautions, they still get an occasional lawsuit; remember the one where the parents ‘dangled’ the child over the railing/plexiglass restrainer? Lawyers are ‘hungry’ for such opportunities to sue. In this tale, I detect that there wasn’t a ‘real’ desire to make money, i.e., the abbot didn’t press the donkey-ride idea and the donkeys were sold even though they were used to till the vineyard. A zoo would have kept the donkeys away from the people, but, then again, a zoo would want to make money. I suspect that any wine from the vineyard was consumed on site. Father Schall doesn’t say what replaced the donkeys, if anything did. On the other hand, there is a farm near me where a mule and an ox share a field that abuts a road. The mule does occasionally wander up to the fence and sticks its head over. If a person stopped their car and let a child try to pet the mule which was subsequently bitten by the mule, the sheriff, if called out, would call the adult a ‘dang fool’ and give them a ticket for endangering a child. Which would you say was ‘culturized’?

  • As a keeper of four of these animals I can testify to their gentle nature. While they sometimes kick each other, they will never harm children because they always adapt their behaviour when they sense the presence of more vulnerable creatures.

  • mohawkkateri

    Shakespeare’s famous point about what to do with an excess of lawyers aside, this tale, to me, seems to cry out for a second chapter, in which the newly donkey-free Jesuits re-establish an historic winery as an organic vineyard inviting local homeschooling families to join into a coop to tend the vineyard and in their turn produce a prized vintage for profit and eduction.

  • James Stagg

    What a charming, and sad, story! Thank you, Father Schall!

  • GoodKnight

    I would suggest that the good Jesuits expand their presence into the population of Los Gatos. Then they would have more jackasses then they could shake a stick at. But I don’t think rides would be appropriate . . . on the other hand . . .

  • What a shame– animals love their range, and those donkeys had their symbiotic relationship with the farm. Such losses are caused anytime people get too fidgety about manicuring their land and its other inhabitants, in place of God’s nature itself.